HomeGSTGSTAT Has Power To Grant Interim Stay: Bombay High Court

GSTAT Has Power To Grant Interim Stay: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has held that the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) possesses inherent jurisdiction to grant interim relief, including stay of recovery proceedings, even in the absence of an express statutory provision under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). The Bench of Justice G.S. Kulkarni and Justice…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 4.5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Onerous Conditions Imposed For Provisional Release Of Seized Imported Goods Shouldn’t Amount To Virtual Denial Of Relief: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Sustain ₹6.75 Crore S. 68 Addition Without Rebutting Assessee’s Evidence: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department...

Fake CA Accused of Misappropriating ₹2.44 Crore Meant for GST, PF and ESIC Deposits Denied Bail by Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has refused to grant bail to a man accused of...

Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit Must Count Towards Mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes CESTAT Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that the mandatory pre-deposit made at the first...

More like this

Onerous Conditions Imposed For Provisional Release Of Seized Imported Goods Shouldn’t Amount To Virtual Denial Of Relief: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Sustain ₹6.75 Crore S. 68 Addition Without Rebutting Assessee’s Evidence: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department...

Fake CA Accused of Misappropriating ₹2.44 Crore Meant for GST, PF and ESIC Deposits Denied Bail by Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has refused to grant bail to a man accused of...