Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST SCN Quashes After Taxpayer Says Audit Reply Was Overlooked: Punjab and...

GST SCN Quashes After Taxpayer Says Audit Reply Was Overlooked: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside two GST show cause notices issued following the report after the taxpayer said that the audit reply was overlooked.

The Bench of Chief Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Rohit Kapoor directed the authorities to consider that material and prepare a fresh audit report within six weeks thereafter. It consequently set aside the show cause notices dated December 9 and December 16, 2024. Any fresh notices, the court said, must follow the audit report prepared under its directions.

Buy Now: E-Magazine: 1000+ Landmark GST Judgments (2017–2026)

The dispute arose from an audit report issued in Form GST ADT-02 on December 4, 2024, against M/s GIL-TPL (JV). The taxpayer challenged the report, saying it had not been given a proper opportunity to address the discrepancies identified during the audit.

According to the taxpayer, it had submitted comments on those discrepancies, but the authorities finalised the report on the basis that no reply had been filed. It also challenged the subsequent show cause notices issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The department later informed the court that the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Ambala, was willing to revisit the matter after giving the taxpayer an opportunity to clarify the issues raised in the audit report.

The taxpayer’s counsel told the court that it would cooperate and provide the relevant details.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Profit From Resale of Airline Cargo Space Is Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Used Railway Rails Can’t Be Taxed as Track Material Without Proof They Are Fit for Reuse: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Paid Twice Can’t Be Retained Because First Payment Was Missing From ST-3 Return: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Cab Service for SEZ Staff Can’t Be Denied Tax Exemption Citing Part of Journey Is Outside SEZ: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Profit From Resale of Airline Cargo Space Is Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Used Railway Rails Can’t Be Taxed as Track Material Without Proof They Are Fit for Reuse: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Paid Twice Can’t Be Retained Because First Payment Was Missing From ST-3 Return: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Cab Service for SEZ Staff Can’t Be Denied Tax Exemption Citing Part of Journey Is Outside SEZ: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...