GST Refund Limitation Inapplicable to Double Tax Deposit Made Under Mistake: Orissa HC

HomeGSTGST Refund Limitation Inapplicable to Double Tax Deposit Made Under Mistake: Orissa...

GST Refund Limitation Inapplicable to Double Tax Deposit Made Under Mistake: Orissa HC

GST Top Stories

Published on

18/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has held that the limitation period prescribed under Section 54 of the GST Act does not apply where tax has been deposited twice under a mistaken notion. The bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri Raman directed refund of excess GST amounting to Rs. 12,03,290, observing that retention…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Refund

GST Refund Limitation Inapplicable to Double Tax Deposit Made Under Mistake: Orissa HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

Jharkhand High Court Slams State Building Construction Corp. for “Dishonest” Review Plea to Evade Settlement, Imposes Rs. 50K Personal Costs

Can’t Unfreeze Bank Account Amid Allegations of Fraudulent Multi-Layer Transactions: Punjab & Haryana HC

Delay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even In Interest Claims On Rebate: Bombay High Court

Bombay HC Directs Filing of CA-Certified Affidavit to Prove No Unjust Enrichment in Tax Dispute Involving Flat Buyers

More like this

Jharkhand High Court Slams State Building Construction Corp. for “Dishonest” Review Plea to Evade Settlement, Imposes Rs. 50K Personal Costs

Can’t Unfreeze Bank Account Amid Allegations of Fraudulent Multi-Layer Transactions: Punjab & Haryana HC

Delay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even In Interest Claims On Rebate: Bombay High Court

About us

Company

Categories