Login
Login
HomeGSTGST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka High Court

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has set aside a GST appellate order against an education services company and directed the tax authorities to sanction a refund of over ₹3.91 crore along with applicable interest, holding that the services rendered by the company do not qualify as those of an “intermediary” under the GST law. The bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Wrong Selection of S. 10(23C) Instead of S. 12AB Requires Fresh Examination Under CBDT Circular: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the wrong selection of section 10(23c) instead...
Direct Tax

Pre-29 March 2022 Faceless Reassessment Orders Valid: ITAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had upheld the validity...
Direct Tax

Gains from Strategic Investments and Venture Capital Funds Taxable as Capital Gains, Not Business Income: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that gains...
Columns

Filing an Appeal Before GSTAT? Here Are the Key Clarifications You Need to Know 

Taxpayers and professionals filing appeals before GSTAT need clarity on one thing above all...

More like this

Direct Tax

Wrong Selection of S. 10(23C) Instead of S. 12AB Requires Fresh Examination Under CBDT Circular: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the wrong selection of section 10(23c) instead...
Direct Tax

Pre-29 March 2022 Faceless Reassessment Orders Valid: ITAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had upheld the validity...
Direct Tax

Gains from Strategic Investments and Venture Capital Funds Taxable as Capital Gains, Not Business Income: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that gains...

About us

About Jurishour – Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments.

Company

Categories

© 2025 Juris Hour. All Rights Reserved.