GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

HomeGSTGST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated...

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

GST

Published on

04/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that the recovery proceedings can be initiated against the supplier, only if the proceedings initiated against the purchaser did not materialize. The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. has observed that recovery proceedings would be justified against the purchaser, only in a case where the Department is able to…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Recovery Proceedings

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

Bona Fide Mistakes Shouldn’t Defeat Substantive Tax Rights: Karnataka High Court Allows Correction of GST DRC-03 Filing Error

More like this

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories