Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated...

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC 

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that the recovery proceedings can be initiated against the supplier, only if the proceedings initiated against the purchaser did not materialize.  The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. has observed that recovery proceedings would be justified against the purchaser, only in a case where the Department is able to…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Customs Can’t Use Residual Penalty Provision After Confiscation Grounds Fail: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has dismissed two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs...
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Questions PILs in Tender Disputes, Allows Contractor to Complete PMGSY Road Project

The Supreme Court has observed that disputes involving the comparative evaluation of competing bidders...
Supreme Court

Arbitration Venue Doesn’t Automatically Become Juridical Seat: Supreme Court Restores S. 34 Challenge

The Supreme Court has held that merely conducting arbitration proceedings at a particular location...
Indirect Taxes

Supreme Court Reserves Verdict on States’ Power to Levy Additional Sales Tax, Surcharge or Cess

The Supreme Court has reserved its judgment on a significant constitutional question concerning the...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Customs Can’t Use Residual Penalty Provision After Confiscation Grounds Fail: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has dismissed two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs...
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Questions PILs in Tender Disputes, Allows Contractor to Complete PMGSY Road Project

The Supreme Court has observed that disputes involving the comparative evaluation of competing bidders...
Supreme Court

Arbitration Venue Doesn’t Automatically Become Juridical Seat: Supreme Court Restores S. 34 Challenge

The Supreme Court has held that merely conducting arbitration proceedings at a particular location...