Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated...

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC 

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that the recovery proceedings can be initiated against the supplier, only if the proceedings initiated against the purchaser did not materialize.  The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. has observed that recovery proceedings would be justified against the purchaser, only in a case where the Department is able to…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Car Dealer’s Sales Incentives, Trade Discounts Not Liable To Service Tax: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Engineering Consultancy For Indian Project Supplied To Japan Not Liable To Service Tax: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...
Direct Tax

Draft Assessment Order Mandatory Even After Tribunal Remand: Supreme Court Rejects Revenue’s Pleas

The Supreme Court has upheld the setting aside of income tax assessments completed without...
Direct Tax

Interest Forming Part Of Court Decree Is Not Taxable As ‘Interest’: ITAT Deletes Rs. 2.47 Crore Addition

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that interest...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Car Dealer’s Sales Incentives, Trade Discounts Not Liable To Service Tax: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Engineering Consultancy For Indian Project Supplied To Japan Not Liable To Service Tax: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...
Direct Tax

Draft Assessment Order Mandatory Even After Tribunal Remand: Supreme Court Rejects Revenue’s Pleas

The Supreme Court has upheld the setting aside of income tax assessments completed without...