HomeGSTGST Order Invalid if Seized Documents Not Supplied To Assessee: Calcutta High...

GST Order Invalid if Seized Documents Not Supplied To Assessee: Calcutta High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has set aside the effect of a GST adjudication order passed against holding that failure to supply seized documents and a computer CPU to the taxpayer deprived it of a fair opportunity to defend itself and violated principles of natural justice.  The bench of Justice Om Narayan Rai observed that  non-availability…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 13 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for August 13, 2026.GSTNO JURISDICTIONAL BAR U/S 6(2)(B)...

Electricity Theft Can’t Be Alleged on Suspicion Alone; Inspection Report Must Record Evidence of Theft: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a consumer cannot be proceeded against for theft...

Appellate Courts Must Decide Cases on Existing Evidence Where Issues Are Already Covered: Supreme Court Quashes Remand

The Supreme Court has reiterated that remand of a civil matter to the trial...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 13 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for August 13, 2026.GSTNO JURISDICTIONAL BAR U/S 6(2)(B)...

Electricity Theft Can’t Be Alleged on Suspicion Alone; Inspection Report Must Record Evidence of Theft: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a consumer cannot be proceeded against for theft...