GST ITC | Once Returns Submitted U/s 16(5), Time Limit U/s 16(4) Loses Its Significance: Kerala HC

HomeGSTGST ITC | Once Returns Submitted U/s 16(5), Time Limit U/s 16(4)...

GST ITC | Once Returns Submitted U/s 16(5), Time Limit U/s 16(4) Loses Its Significance: Kerala HC

GST Top Stories

Published on

17/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

GST ITC | Once Returns Submitted U/s 16(5), Time Limit U/s 16(4) Loses Its Significance: Kerala HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court while quashing the Input Tax Credit (ITC) denial, held that once the taxpayer submits returns within the period stipulated in Section 16(5), the time limit under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act loses its significance. The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. has observed that the claim now raised by the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Time Limit

GST ITC | Once Returns Submitted U/s 16(5), Time Limit U/s 16(4) Loses Its Significance: Kerala HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

Software Payments Not Taxable As Royalty: Delhi HC

Students Shifted From Failed Private Medical College Cannot Claim Government-Rate MBBS Fees Indefinitely: Supreme Court

CESTAT Upholds Penalty On Philips Electronics In Excise Undervaluation Case

Cashbacks Received On Commercial Credit Card Usage Not Taxable As Service: CESTAT

More like this

Software Payments Not Taxable As Royalty: Delhi HC

Students Shifted From Failed Private Medical College Cannot Claim Government-Rate MBBS Fees Indefinitely: Supreme Court

CESTAT Upholds Penalty On Philips Electronics In Excise Undervaluation Case

About us

Company

Categories