HomeGSTGST ITC on Belated Returns: Karnataka High Court Restores GST Proceedings, Says...

GST ITC on Belated Returns: Karnataka High Court Restores GST Proceedings, Says Taxpayer Must Get Opportunity to Claim ITC Under Amended Law

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an adjudication order and consequential tax demand against a Bengaluru Rural trader, holding that the taxpayer must be given an opportunity to present her case, particularly in light of the amended provisions governing Input Tax Credit (ITC).

The bench of Justice B.M. Shyam Prasad has observed that since the applicability of the amended statutory provision had not been considered during adjudication, the matter deserved to be restored to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after granting the taxpayer an effective opportunity to present her case.

The dispute arose after GST authorities initiated proceedings on the ground that the petitioner was ineligible to claim Input Tax Credit because her GSTR-3B returns had been filed beyond the prescribed timelines. The adjudication proceedings culminated in a tax demand after the department recorded that the taxpayer had neither responded to the show cause notice nor participated in the personal hearing conducted through the GST portal.

Buy Now: GST Judgements E-Compilation – June 2026

Before the High Court, the petitioner contended that she had remained unaware of the notices as she was not computer literate and therefore could not access communications uploaded on the GST portal. She also argued that, on merits, she was entitled to claim ITC by virtue of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, introduced through legislative amendments with retrospective effect from July 1, 2017. According to her, the amended provision permits the availment of ITC where the relevant returns were filed before November 30, 2021.

The High Court accepted that the petitioner’s explanation regarding her lack of computer literacy could not be dismissed as mala fide. The Court observed that her contention concerning eligibility for ITC under Section 16(5) required substantive examination by the tax authorities before any adverse conclusion could be reached.

Accordingly, the High Court quashed both the adjudication order and the consequential tax demand. The petitioner has been directed to appear before the jurisdictional GST authority on July 23, 2026, without awaiting any further notice and submit all documents supporting her claim for Input Tax Credit. The adjudicating authority has been directed to reconsider the matter in accordance with law after examining the petitioner’s contentions.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Karnataka High Court Examines GST ITC Eligibility and Validity of Common Multi-Year Tax Notices

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted bail to a jeweller accused of criminal...

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted bail to a jeweller accused of criminal...

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...