The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the GST authorities to complete adjudication proceedings arising out of a show cause notice proposing reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) only after granting the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing and considering all objections and supporting documents.
The bench of Justice M. Dhandapani clarified that the assessee is free to seek interim relief for lifting the blockage of its Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL), which must be considered independently and expeditiously by the tax authorities.
The petitioner/assessee has challenged a show cause notice issued under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. The petitioner had sought quashing of the notice as well as immediate unblocking of its Electronic Credit Ledger, contending that the proceedings were initiated in an arbitrary manner.
Buy Now: GST Judgements E-Compilation – June 2026
The dispute arose after the GST department issued a show cause notice proposing reversal of Input Tax Credit under the IGST head, along with interest and penalties under Sections 74 and 74A of the CGST Act. The petitioner challenged the notice before the High Court, alleging that it had been issued without proper application of mind and failed to disclose the specific reasons for invoking Rule 86A of the CGST Rules relating to the blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger.
The petitioner further argued that it had already submitted its explanation before the issuance of the impugned notice, but the authorities failed to consider the same. According to the petitioner, there was no suppression of facts warranting invocation of the stringent provisions under Sections 74 and 74A of the CGST Act, rendering the proceedings without jurisdiction and in violation of the principles of natural justice.
Appearing for the GST department, the Senior Central Government Standing Counsel submitted that the proceedings were still at the show cause notice stage and that no final adjudication had yet taken place.
The department argued that the petitioner had an adequate opportunity to place all objections and documentary evidence before the adjudicating authority. It also defended the blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger, stating that the action had been taken in exercise of powers conferred under the CGST Act and the Rules framed thereunder.
After considering the rival submissions, the High Court refrained from examining the merits of the allegations contained in the show cause notice. Instead, it emphasized that since the matter was still at the adjudication stage, the appropriate course was to ensure that the taxpayer received a fair opportunity to present its case before the competent authority.
The Court observed that the petitioner should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to place all objections and supporting materials before the adjudicating authority before any final decision is taken.
Disposing of the writ petition, the High Court directed the first respondent to conclude the proceedings initiated through the impugned show cause notice after granting the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing; considering all objections and documents submitted by the petitioner; and passing a reasoned order on merits in accordance with law.
The Court directed that the entire exercise be completed within four weeks from the date of receipt of the Court’s order.
Although the Court did not order immediate unblocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger, it clarified that the petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate interim application before the adjudicating authority seeking lifting of the blockage.
Importantly, the Court directed that if such an application is filed, the authority must consider and dispose of it independently, on its own merits, and as expeditiously as possible.
Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy
To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.
