HomeGSTCalcutta High Court Seeks GST Department's Reply in Challenge to Denial of...

Calcutta High Court Seeks GST Department’s Reply in Challenge to Denial of Cross-Examination in Adjudication Proceedings

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has directed the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) authorities to file an affidavit explaining their stand in a writ petition which has challenged actions taken during GST adjudication proceedings, including the denial of cross-examination of multiple witnesses.

The petitioner questioned the manner in which evidence relied upon by the GST authorities was gathered and used during adjudication. During the hearing, Central GST department informed the Court that the relevant Excel spreadsheets relied upon in the proceedings had been obtained through the diplomatic channels of the Government of Bhutan.

A significant issue before the Court relates to the petitioner’s request for cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were allegedly relied upon by the Department. The GST authorities submitted that the adjudicating authority had already dealt with the issue in detail in the impugned order and had concluded that the denial of cross-examination did not result in any prejudice or injustice to the petitioner.

Buy Now: GST Judgements E-Compilation – June 2026

The Department further argued that permitting the cross-examination of fifteen witnesses at this stage of the proceedings would not be a feasible or practical course of action. According to the Department, the impugned order adequately addressed the reasons for declining the request and justified the decision on the facts of the case.

After considering the submissions, Justice Kausik Chanda did not express any final opinion on the merits of the controversy. Instead, the Court granted the GST Department two weeks to place its stand on record by filing an affidavit. The petitioner has been granted one additional week thereafter to file a reply affidavit addressing the Department’s contentions.

The High Court has directed that the matter be listed again after three weeks under the same heading for further consideration. The order indicates that the Court will examine the rival contentions after the pleadings are completed before deciding the legal issues raised in the writ petition.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: GST Appellate Authority Can’t Remand Cases Back to Adjudicating Authority U/s 107: Calcutta High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 20 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 20, 2026.GSTGHAZIABAD DGGI | MEERUT COURT...

Allahabad High Court Judge Challenges CBDT’s Denial of Section 22D Tax Exemption Under New Tax Regime

A sitting judge of the Allahabad High Court, Justice Sandeep Jain, has approached the...

Block Assessment Can’t Be Based on Post-Search Investigation: Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition

The Delhi High Court has quashed the Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition and held...

Insurer Liable for Nepal Accident Despite No Extra Premium: Supreme Court Says Valid Permit Extends Motor Insurance Coverage

The Supreme Court has held that an insurance company cannot deny liability for a...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 20 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 20, 2026.GSTGHAZIABAD DGGI | MEERUT COURT...

Allahabad High Court Judge Challenges CBDT’s Denial of Section 22D Tax Exemption Under New Tax Regime

A sitting judge of the Allahabad High Court, Justice Sandeep Jain, has approached the...

Block Assessment Can’t Be Based on Post-Search Investigation: Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition

The Delhi High Court has quashed the Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition and held...