HomeGSTRs. 9.51 Crores GST Demand Against Nexus Mall: Karnataka High Court Grants...

Rs. 9.51 Crores GST Demand Against Nexus Mall: Karnataka High Court Grants Liberty To Appeal

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has granted the Nexus Mall the liberty to file an appeal challenging the GST demand of Rs. 9.51 Crores.

The bench of Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the appellate authority within a period of six weeks from today. The interim orders passed by the Court in the petition shall continue for a period of six weeks. 

The petitioner, Nexus Mall has challenged the writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari and after going into the validity and legality of the provisions set aside and quash the Notice in Form GST DRC-13 as bad in law.

The petitioner submitted that in view of furnishing of Order to the petitioner via email dated 22.04.2025 by the respondents during the pendency of the petition, the petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority in accordance with law and by continuing the interim order passed by this Court for a period of four weeks from today. 

The court disposed of the petition and held that the amounts already recovered by the respondents shall be subject to the final outcome of the appeals to be filed by the petitioner.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S Nexus Shantiniketan Retail Private Limited Versus Union Of India

Case No.: WRIT PETITION NO. 9868 OF 2025 (T-RES)

Date: 28/04/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: BHARAT BHAGWAN RAICHANDANI

Counsel For Respondent: MADANAN PILLAI

Read More: ED Seizes 15 Luxury Vehicles in Assam Ponzi Scam Worth ₹258 Crore

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CAs vs Advocates: ICAI Concludes Arguments Before Delhi HC in 21-Year-Old Battle Over Right of Appearance Before Tribunals

The long-running legal battle over whether non-advocates, particularly Chartered Accountants, can appear before tribunals...

Bona Fide Reliance on Form 16 Can’t Be Treated as Misreporting: ITAT Deletes Rs. 51.20 Lakh Penalty on ESOP Exemption Claim

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted a penalty...

Borrowed Funds Used for Subsidiary Still Eligible for Interest Deduction U/s 36(1)(iii): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that borrowed funds used for subsidiaries are still eligible...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 21, 2026.GSTSupreme Court Allows GST Assessee...

More like this

CAs vs Advocates: ICAI Concludes Arguments Before Delhi HC in 21-Year-Old Battle Over Right of Appearance Before Tribunals

The long-running legal battle over whether non-advocates, particularly Chartered Accountants, can appear before tribunals...

Bona Fide Reliance on Form 16 Can’t Be Treated as Misreporting: ITAT Deletes Rs. 51.20 Lakh Penalty on ESOP Exemption Claim

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted a penalty...

Borrowed Funds Used for Subsidiary Still Eligible for Interest Deduction U/s 36(1)(iii): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that borrowed funds used for subsidiaries are still eligible...