Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Council May Ease Small Refund Claims and Strengthen 90% Provisional Payouts

GST Council May Ease Small Refund Claims and Strengthen 90% Provisional Payouts

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The GST Council may consider further changes to small refund claims and risk-based provisional payments at its October 8 meeting. The proposals could improve access to eligible refunds, but the 90% provisional refund mechanism is already part of the GST administration for qualifying claims.

Reports indicate that the ₹1,000 minimum refund threshold could be assessed across tax heads together rather than separately. That proposal should be distinguished from allowing every historic credit balance to be withdrawn: a balance must fall within a legally available refund category.

Buy Now: 160+ GST E-Magazine September 2026

The Council’s official October 2025 newsletter records the introduction of risk-based provisional sanction under Rule 91(2). It also describes an interim arrangement allowing 90% provisional sanction for eligible inverted duty refund applications filed on or after October 1, 2025.

Financial Express has reported that the upcoming meeting may consider statutory backing for the inverted duty arrangement. The potential development is therefore an extension or strengthening of an existing mechanism, rather than the first introduction of 90% provisional refunds.

Provisional sanction also differs from final approval. Risk classification, statutory exclusions and subsequent verification remain relevant. The official instructions allow detailed examination in specified circumstances, including exceptional cases supported by recorded reasons.

As an illustration of the cash-flow effect, an eligible claimant receiving most of a refund provisionally can use that money while the remaining amount undergoes verification. That does not establish a right to payment of the entire amount originally claimed.

For smaller claims, the final rules will need to explain aggregation, the treatment of earlier applications and any applicable time limits. Excess cash in the electronic cash ledger and accumulated credit in the electronic credit ledger also require different legal treatment.

The eventual recommendation should be read alongside existing provisions so that businesses can identify what changes, what is already available and which claims remain subject to scrutiny.

Read More: GST Notices Below Rs. 10K May Be Curbed, with Relief for Pending Disputes: 57th GST Council Meet

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Income Tax Penalty Invalid If Notice Fails To Specify Under-Reporting Or Misreporting Charge: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a penalty...

Rs. 11.56 Crore GST ITC Fraud Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As Investigation Is Complete

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to the authorised signatory...

10% Stamp Duty Valuation Tolerance Applies To AY 2018-19: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

IBC Appeal Filed Without Delay-Condonation Plea Cannot Escape 45-Day Limit: NCLAT Dismisses ED’s Appeal

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has dismissed an...

More like this

Income Tax Penalty Invalid If Notice Fails To Specify Under-Reporting Or Misreporting Charge: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a penalty...

Rs. 11.56 Crore GST ITC Fraud Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As Investigation Is Complete

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to the authorised signatory...

10% Stamp Duty Valuation Tolerance Applies To AY 2018-19: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...