Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Commissioner Can’t Review Order Passed By Appellate Authority : Delhi High...

GST Commissioner Can’t Review Order Passed By Appellate Authority : Delhi High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has held that the GST commissioner cannot review orders passed by appellate authority.

The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Dharmesh Sharma has observed that the Commissioner, while seeking to review an order passed under the Act and in purported exercise of powers vested by Section 107(2), cannot possibly sit over and above an order passed by the appellate authority. The power enshrined in Section 107(2) is concerned with the examination of the record of proceedings which may have been undertaken by an adjudicating authority. It clearly does not contemplate the Commissioner seeking to even attempt to review an order passed by the appellate authority. 

The bench stated that the power  wielded by the Commissioner with reference to Section 107(2) is rendered unsustainable.

The petitioner/assessee is stated to have applied for refund for the period April 2018 to March 2019 in terms of two applications dated 04 July 2019 and 09 July 2019. Two deficiency memos came to be issued by the respondents while considering the aforesaid applications. It is the case of the writ petitioner that the deficiency memos were duly attended to and all material duly supplied.

Since the refund was not released even thereafter, the petitioner is stated to have approached the respondents by way of representations dated 13 February 2020 and 27 February 2020.

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order of 24 May 2024.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S G.S Industries Versus Commissioner Of Central Tax And GST, Delhi

Case No.:  W.P.(C) 13149/2024

Date: 16.12.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Siddharth Malhotra

Counsel For Respondent: Aditya Singla

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 8 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 8, 2026.GSTCREDIT NOTES MUST REDUCE TURNOVER...

GST Council Proposes Used-Car Dealer ITC Relief, 5% GST Option For EV Services And Sector-Specific Exemptions

The GST Council has recommended a series of changes and clarifications covering goods and...

GST Council Proposes Validation Of Multi-Year Notices, Wider E-Invoicing For Businesses With ₹5 Crore Turnover

The GST Council has recommended a series of compliance reforms, including a statutory provision...

GST Council Backs Annual Return Scheme For Small B2C Businesses, Recommends Clarity On ITC And Pre-Deposits

The GST Council has approved in principle a concept note for an optional Annual...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 8 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 8, 2026.GSTCREDIT NOTES MUST REDUCE TURNOVER...

GST Council Proposes Used-Car Dealer ITC Relief, 5% GST Option For EV Services And Sector-Specific Exemptions

The GST Council has recommended a series of changes and clarifications covering goods and...

GST Council Proposes Validation Of Multi-Year Notices, Wider E-Invoicing For Businesses With ₹5 Crore Turnover

The GST Council has recommended a series of compliance reforms, including a statutory provision...