HomeGSTGST Appellate Tribunal Not Functional Till Date : Supreme Court Issues Notice...

GST Appellate Tribunal Not Functional Till Date : Supreme Court Issues Notice To Govt.

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has issued the notice to Union Of India as the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) is not functional till date.

The bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manmohan has said “We would like to first know at the earliest why the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal has not been made functional till this date. We want a report in the aforesaid regard by the next date of hearing.”

The petitioner/assessee submitted that the High Court declined to entertain the Writ Petition filed by the petitioner – herein on the ground that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of an appeal under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal.

However, the fact is that the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal has not been made functional till this date.
5. When this matter was being heard, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the department submitted that it is true that the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal is not functional but if the assessee wants to file an appeal, he can file it with a pre-deposit of 10% of the tax liability demanded by the authority.

The court held that a writ petition had to be filed before the High Court as the Department wants to claim back the amount which was already refunded to the assessee. The order passed by the Department asking the assessee to pay back the already refunded amount shall remain from its operation.

The court issued the notice to the government, returnable in three weeks.

Read More: Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Order Against Corporate Debtor

Case Details

Case Title: Team Computers Private Limited Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)  No.29276/2024

Date: 13/12/2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Kavin Gulati

Counsel For Respondent: Rupesh Kumar

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that mere facilitation of customs clearance cannot establish...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the income tax department cannot ignore documents,...

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the...

Settled Customs Dispute Can’t Be Reopened Through Article 226 Challenge to Interest Liability: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that a party which consciously opts to settle...

More like this

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that mere facilitation of customs clearance cannot establish...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the income tax department cannot ignore documents,...

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the...