HomeGSTGovt. Regularizes GST On Co-Insurance Premium Apportioned By Lead Insurer To The...

Govt. Regularizes GST On Co-Insurance Premium Apportioned By Lead Insurer To The Co-Insurer 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has issued the circular regarding the regularizing payment of GST on co-insurance premium apportioned by the lead insurer to the co-insurer and on ceding/re-insurance commission deducted from the reinsurance premium paid by the insurer to the reinsurer.

Based on the recommendations of the GST Council in its 53rd meeting held on 22nd June, 2024, at New Delhi, and in exercise of the powers conferred under section 168(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the clarification is being issued through the Circular.

List Of Activities On Which No GST Is Payable

These activities or transactions were included in Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017 as activities or transactions which shall be treated neither as a supply of goods nor as a supply of services:

Firstly, activity of apportionment of co-insurance premium by the lead insurer to the co-insurer for the insurance services jointly supplied by the lead insurer and the co-insurer to the insured in co-insurance agreements, subject to the condition that the lead insurer pays the Central tax, the State tax, the Union territory tax and the integrated tax on the entire amount of premium paid by the insured.

Secondly,  Services by insurer to the reinsurer for which ceding commission or the reinsurance commission is deducted from reinsurance premium paid by the insurer to the reinsurer, subject to the condition that the Central tax, the State tax, the Union territory tax and the integrated tax is paid by the reinsurer on the gross reinsurance premium payable by the insurer to the reinsurer, inclusive of the said ceding commission or the reinsurance commission.

In its 53rd meeting, the GST Council recommended that the payment of GST on the activities or transactions, may be regularized for the past period, i.e. from 01.07.2017 to the effective date of amendments in the CGST Act, , on ‘as is where is’ basis.

Thus, as recommended by the 53rd GST Council, the payment of GST on the activities or transactions specified in paragraph 2 above is regularized for the period 01.07.2017 to 31.10.2024, on ‘as is where is’ basis.

Circular Details

Circular No. 244/01/2025-GST

Date: 28/01/2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 27 July, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 27, 2026.GSTDEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but...

IBC Moratorium Doesn’t Shield Directors from Consumer Proceedings: Supreme Court Revives Homebuyers’ Complaint

The Supreme Court has clarified that the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the...

Courts Can’t Impose Impractical Conditions That Frustrate Investigation: Supreme Court Relaxes Police Custody Restrictions

The Supreme Court has held that while safeguards against custodial abuse are essential, courts...

DEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but Not Eligible ITC Under TNVAT: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that while Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) licences qualify...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 27 July, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 27, 2026.GSTDEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but...

IBC Moratorium Doesn’t Shield Directors from Consumer Proceedings: Supreme Court Revives Homebuyers’ Complaint

The Supreme Court has clarified that the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the...

Courts Can’t Impose Impractical Conditions That Frustrate Investigation: Supreme Court Relaxes Police Custody Restrictions

The Supreme Court has held that while safeguards against custodial abuse are essential, courts...