Goods Had Valid Invoice; Only E-Way Bill Missing: HC Orders Recalculation Of Penalty U/s 129(1)(a) Instead Of 129(1)(b)

HomeGSTGoods Had Valid Invoice; Only E-Way Bill Missing: HC Orders Recalculation Of...

Goods Had Valid Invoice; Only E-Way Bill Missing: HC Orders Recalculation Of Penalty U/s 129(1)(a) Instead Of 129(1)(b)

GST Top Stories

Published on

26/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Goods Had Valid Invoice; Only E-Way Bill Missing: HC Orders Recalculation Of Penalty U/s 129(1)(a) Instead Of 129(1)(b)

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has quashed a penalty order imposed by the State Tax authorities for an e-way bill lapse, ruling that officials had wrongly invoked Section 129(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (UPGST) Act instead of the applicable Section 129(1)(a). The bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Indrajeet Shukla…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Goods Had Valid Invoice; Only E-Way Bill Missing: HC Orders Recalculation Of Penalty U/s 129(1)(a) Instead Of 129(1)(b)

Membership Required

Latest articles

Cadre Change Not Same as Transfer: Supreme Court Directs Reallocation to Uttarakhand, Slams State Apathy After 26-Year Delay

Conviction Can Rest on Sole Injured Eyewitness if Testimony is of ‘Sterling Quality’: Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment

Supreme Court Slams Delay by Tamil Nadu Govt, Vacates Status Quo in Decades-Old Thazhambur Land Dispute; Protects Rights of Innocent Flat Buyers

ITAT Quashes Reassessment for AY 2017–18 Over Invalid Approval U/s 151(ii), Deletes Rs. 10.09 Lakh Addition

More like this

Cadre Change Not Same as Transfer: Supreme Court Directs Reallocation to Uttarakhand, Slams State Apathy After 26-Year Delay

Conviction Can Rest on Sole Injured Eyewitness if Testimony is of ‘Sterling Quality’: Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment

Supreme Court Slams Delay by Tamil Nadu Govt, Vacates Status Quo in Decades-Old Thazhambur Land Dispute; Protects Rights of Innocent Flat Buyers

About us

Company

Categories