Gauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes, Suspends SCN Against Patanjali Foods

HomeGSTGauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes,...

Gauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes, Suspends SCN Against Patanjali Foods

GST

Published on

17/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Gauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes, Suspends SCN Against Patanjali Foods

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gauhati High Court has suspended four show-cause notices against Patanjali Foods while questioning the constitutional validity of restricting Input Tax Credit (ITC) through state incentive schemes, specifically Clause 8 of Assam Industries (Tax Reimbursement for Eligible Units) Scheme, 2017. The bench of Justice Manish Choudhury has observed that Clause 8 of Assam Industries (Tax…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Gauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes, Suspends SCN Against Patanjali Foods

Membership Required

Latest articles

No Fresh Pre-Deposit Required if Earlier Deposit Exceeds Tribunal Requirement After Appellate Relief: GSTAT

Allahabad HC Entertains GST Challenge Against Retrospective Penalty u/s 122(1A), Stays Coercive Recovery

Karnataka High Court Grants Interim Relief in GST Dispute Over Pre-GST Joint Development Agreement and ITC Denial

DGGI Can Invoke Extended Limitation Under Section 74 Where Foundational Facts Exist: Madras High Court

More like this

No Fresh Pre-Deposit Required if Earlier Deposit Exceeds Tribunal Requirement After Appellate Relief: GSTAT

Allahabad HC Entertains GST Challenge Against Retrospective Penalty u/s 122(1A), Stays Coercive Recovery

Karnataka High Court Grants Interim Relief in GST Dispute Over Pre-GST Joint Development Agreement and ITC Denial

About us

Company

Categories