Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes,...

Gauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes, Suspends SCN Against Patanjali Foods

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Gauhati HC Questions Constitutional Validity Of Restricting ITC Through State Incentive Schemes, Suspends SCN Against Patanjali Foods

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gauhati High Court has suspended four show-cause notices against Patanjali Foods while questioning the constitutional validity of restricting Input Tax Credit (ITC) through state incentive schemes, specifically Clause 8 of Assam Industries (Tax Reimbursement for Eligible Units) Scheme, 2017. The bench of Justice Manish Choudhury has observed that Clause 8 of Assam Industries (Tax…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...
GST

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...
GST

GST Audit Detection Alone Doesn’t Prove Wilful Suppression: GSTAT Quashes S. 74 Proceedings

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that a...
GST

IGST Credit Mistakenly Claimed As CGST, SGST: GSTAT Quashes Demand Order, Directs Fresh Review

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside an...

More like this

GST

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...
GST

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...
GST

GST Audit Detection Alone Doesn’t Prove Wilful Suppression: GSTAT Quashes S. 74 Proceedings

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that a...