Ask Jurishour AI

HomeGSTFraudulent GST ITC Cases Not Fit For Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court

Fraudulent GST ITC Cases Not Fit For Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with a tax demand order involving alleged fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) worth ₹89 lakh, ruling that such disputes—based on complex factual analysis—must be addressed through the statutory appeal mechanism under the GST law, not under the Court’s writ jurisdiction. The Bench of Justice Prathiba…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Excess TDS Can’t Be Retained Indefinitely: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the Income Tax Department cannot deny an...

Suspicion Can’t Replace Proof: CESTAT Quashes Penalty in Alleged Gold-Smuggling Operation

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai West Zonal Bench, has...

Free-of-Cost Specification Drawings Supplied During Tender Stage Not includible in Excise Assessable Value: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has set aside...

Buyer Liable for Customs Duty and Interest on Fraudulently Imported Yamaha Bike: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that...

More like this

Excess TDS Can’t Be Retained Indefinitely: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the Income Tax Department cannot deny an...

Suspicion Can’t Replace Proof: CESTAT Quashes Penalty in Alleged Gold-Smuggling Operation

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai West Zonal Bench, has...

Free-of-Cost Specification Drawings Supplied During Tender Stage Not includible in Excise Assessable Value: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has set aside...