HomeGSTGhaziabad DGGI | ₹22.80 Crore Fake FSSAI Licence Scam: Meerut Court Sends...

Ghaziabad DGGI | ₹22.80 Crore Fake FSSAI Licence Scam: Meerut Court Sends Accused to Judicial Custody Under Health Security & National Security Cess Act 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A Special Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Meerut has remanded two accused – Ravi Kumar Mathur and Rohit Baghel to judicial custody under Health Security & National Security Cess Act, 2025 until July 3, 2026, in connection with an alleged large-scale fraud involving the issuance of fake Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) licences and certificates. 

The case involves allegations of unlawful gains running into several crores of rupees through the creation and operation of a fake licensing network.

According to the remand order dated June 19, 2026, the accused, Ravi Kumar Mathur and Rohit Baghel, were produced before the court by officials of the Ghaziabad unit of the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). Investigators alleged that the accused operated a sophisticated setup for generating counterfeit FSSAI licences, registration certificates and related approvals, resulting in substantial financial gains.

SPP Lakshay Kumar Singh on behalf of the Department informed the court that searches conducted on June 17, 2026, at premises linked to the accused led to the recovery of multiple electronic devices, including mobile phones and computers, as well as machinery allegedly used for packaging and labelling activities. Among the items reportedly seized were FFS packing machines, weighing equipment, sealing machines and other devices that investigators believe were connected with the alleged operation. Samples of products found at the premises were also collected and sealed in accordance with prescribed procedures.

Investigators further submitted that digital evidence recovered during the search, including mobile phones and other electronic records, required forensic examination. The prosecution argued that the seized devices contained critical evidence relating to the alleged generation and distribution of fake licences and certificates. Hash values of the electronic devices were reportedly recorded to preserve the integrity of digital evidence.

During the remand proceedings, the prosecution claimed that the alleged fraudulent activities involved transactions amounting to approximately ₹22.80 crore through fake FSSAI licence issuance. The authorities also referred to an alleged overall scam value of around ₹32.76 crore. Based on the material collected during the investigation, the prosecution sought judicial custody of the accused.

The court noted that the accused had been informed of their legal rights, including the availability of legal aid. However, the order records that the accused declined to avail free legal assistance and indicated that they would arrange their own legal representation.

After considering the prosecution’s submissions and examining the case records, the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate remanded both accused to judicial custody until July 3, 2026. The court directed that they be lodged in the District Jail, Meerut, and produced again on the next scheduled date in accordance with law.

The investigation into the alleged fake FSSAI licensing racket is continuing, with authorities expected to conduct forensic analysis of the seized electronic devices and examine additional documentary evidence to ascertain the full extent of the alleged fraud.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Extended Limitation Period Can’t Be Invoked Without Evidence of Suppression: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 20 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 20, 2026.GSTTAXPAYER’S RIGHT TO CORRECT GSTR-1...

Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied Due to Wrong Registration Code: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Purchase of Residential Property from Spouse Doesn’t Bar S. 54 Relief: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

DIGIT Data Entry Guidelines | CBIC Mandates Timely Reporting of Customs Offence Cases

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued instructions laying down...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 20 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 20, 2026.GSTTAXPAYER’S RIGHT TO CORRECT GSTR-1...

Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied Due to Wrong Registration Code: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Purchase of Residential Property from Spouse Doesn’t Bar S. 54 Relief: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...