Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTElectronic Credit Ledger Is A Wallet, Availment Of ITC Benefit Doesn’t Amount...

Electronic Credit Ledger Is A Wallet, Availment Of ITC Benefit Doesn’t Amount To Be Wrongful : Kerala High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that the electronic credit ledger is a wallet, availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefit does not amount to be wrongful.

The bench of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas relied on the decision in the case of Rejimon Padickapparambil Alex v. Union of India and Others in which it was observed that the electronic credit ledger is in the nature of a wallet with different compartments of Integrated Goods and Services Tax, Central Goods and Services Tax and State Goods and Services Tax and there cannot be any wrong availment of input tax credit merely because a taxpayer had availed the benefit of credit of input tax available in IGST under the heads CGST and SGST.

The bench noted that as per the order of assessment produced the alleged mistake committed by the petitioner is by availing the benefit of Input Tax Credit available in IGST, under the heads CGST and SGST. The method of availing ITC cannot be to be a wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit warranting the imposition of any penalty as observed in the above referred judgment. Therefore, it is only appropriate that the order of assessment itself is set aside and a reconsideration be directed by the proper officer.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the order of assessment with respect to the assessment year 2017-2018. As per the order, petitioner was found to have utilised Input Tax Credit in excess and hence a liability to the extent of Rs.19,94,818/-, was imposed on it under Section 73 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017, and State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 

An appeal has also been preferred by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority as early as on 22.03.2024. Despite the lapse of almost eight months, the appeal has not yet been disposed of.

The court while allowing the writ petition, directed the proper officer to reconsider the matter afresh in the light of the decision in Rejimon Padickapparambil Alex’s case, after granting an opportunity of hearing within a period of three months.

Read More: Difference Between Electronic Cash Ledger And Electronic Credit Ledger Under GST

Case Details

Case Title: Star Roofs And Metals Versus The Assistant Commissioner

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 44100 OF 2024

Date: 11/12/2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Akhil Suresh

Counsel For Respondent: Thushara James

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...