Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNo DIN, No Physical Signature? AP High Court Says GST Assessment Still...

No DIN, No Physical Signature? AP High Court Says GST Assessment Still Valid Citing Delay In Filing Petition

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
No DIN, No Physical Signature? AP High Court Says GST Assessment Still Valid Citing Delay In Filing Petition

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging GST assessment and penalty orders on grounds of absence of physical signatures and Document Identification Number (DIN) citing that the petition was barred by delay and that the objections raised were no longer legally sustainable. The Bench comprising Justice R. Raghunandan Rao and Justice…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...
Indirect Taxes

Dept. Can’t Apply Different Yardsticks in Identical Tax Cases: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 21.92 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a departmental appeal challenging the setting aside of...
Direct Tax

Actuarially Determined Provision for Credit Guarantee Claims Is Allowable Deduction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...
Direct Tax

CBDT’s Revised Rs. 2 Crore Tax-Appeal Limit Applies to Pending Cases; Later Exceptions Can’t Operate Retrospectively: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has disposed of an Income Tax Department appeal involving a...

More like this

GST

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...
Indirect Taxes

Dept. Can’t Apply Different Yardsticks in Identical Tax Cases: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 21.92 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a departmental appeal challenging the setting aside of...
Direct Tax

Actuarially Determined Provision for Credit Guarantee Claims Is Allowable Deduction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...