Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTDifference in Month of Reporting Sale and ITC Claim Doesn’t Amount to...

Difference in Month of Reporting Sale and ITC Claim Doesn’t Amount to Tax Evasion: Kerala High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court held that a mere difference in the month of reporting a sale by the supplier and claiming input tax credit (ITC) by the purchaser does not, by itself, amount to tax evasion, particularly when the discrepancy arises due to the timing of receipt of goods and requires only reconciliation. The case…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DGGI | Pre-Charge Evidence Can’t Be Recorded Without Summoning Accused in GST Complaint: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside three orders passed by a...

DGGI Guwahati | GST Search-Based Demand Doesn’t Require Prior Return Scrutiny: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that scrutiny of returns under Section 61 of...

Supreme Court Stays 3 Times Penalty Over Failure to Disclose Order Clarifying Higher Entry Tax Rate

The Supreme Court has stayed further proceedings concerning a penalty of ₹1.17 crore imposed...

More like this

DGGI | Pre-Charge Evidence Can’t Be Recorded Without Summoning Accused in GST Complaint: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside three orders passed by a...

DGGI Guwahati | GST Search-Based Demand Doesn’t Require Prior Return Scrutiny: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that scrutiny of returns under Section 61 of...