DGGI Ghaziabad | No Anticipatory Bail To Person Accused Of Destroying, Evidences And Not Co-Operating During Search Proceedings: Patiala House Court

HomeGSTDGGI Ghaziabad | No Anticipatory Bail To Person Accused Of Destroying Evidences...

DGGI Ghaziabad | No Anticipatory Bail To Person Accused Of Destroying Evidences And Not Co-Operating During Search Proceedings: Patiala House Court

GST

Published on

30/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Patiala House Court has rejected the anticipatory bail application of businessman Aman Garg in a case involving alleged large-scale fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime and held that the a person accused of destroying and tampering with evidences and not co-operating during the search proceedings…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

DGGI Ghaziabad | No Anticipatory Bail To Person Accused Of Destroying Evidences And Not Co-Operating During Search Proceedings: Patiala House Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

Maintenance to Qualified Wife Denied: Allahabad High Court [READ ORDER]

Delay Must Be Examined Considering Wrong Service of Order: CESTAT Remands BHEL’s Excise Refund Appeal

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

Mere Deposit in Electronic Ledger Not GST Payment: Andhra Pradesh HC Quashes Composite Order

More like this

Maintenance to Qualified Wife Denied: Allahabad High Court [READ ORDER]

Delay Must Be Examined Considering Wrong Service of Order: CESTAT Remands BHEL’s Excise Refund Appeal

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

About us

Company

Categories