HomeGSTDelhi High Court Stays GST Imposition on CCI

Delhi High Court Stays GST Imposition on CCI

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant relief to the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the Delhi High Court on granted a stay on the imposition of Goods and Services Tax (GST), including interest and penalties, on the Commission for the consideration received from various parties involved in disputes before it.

The bench comprising Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar passed the interim order in response to a writ petition filed by the CCI. 

The Commission had challenged the order issued by the Additional Commissioner of CGST (Delhi South), which sought to impose GST on fees collected by the regulatory body.

The CCI argued that the CGST order was erroneous, as it overlooked a recent ruling by the Delhi High Court in the case of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC). In that case, the Court had held that statutory regulatory functions do not constitute ‘business’ under the CGST Act, 2017, and are therefore exempt from taxation under Schedule III of the Act.

CCI further contended that it had successfully defended similar taxation issues in prior service tax proceedings, where authorities ruled that its functions did not constitute a taxable service. Those rulings clarified that all fees collected by the CCI are statutorily mandated and not linked to any service. However, the GST Department has appealed that decision, and the matter is still pending before the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

Emphasizing the need for consistency in regulatory taxation matters, the CCI sought parity with other statutory bodies like the CERC and the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC). The Delhi High Court found merit in the argument and extended a stay on the GST imposition, preventing the taxation of regulatory fees collected by the CCI.

CCI was represented by Senior Advocate Sujit Ghosh and Advocate Manu Sanan of Sanan Law, who presented arguments in favor of exempting regulatory fees from GST.

Read More: CESTAT Quashes Penalty On Small Time Printer In Alleged Export Scheme Violation

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

NAAAR Amended But Not Born— Curious Case Of S. 101A (1A)

The concept of a National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (NAAAR) was introduced to...

No Fixed Validity for Exporter Self-Sealing Permission: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that the permission...

Can You Pay Rent to Your Father and Claim HRA? Rule Changes from April 2026 

House Rent Allowance (HRA) continues to be one of the most widely used tax-saving...

Former IRS Officer Parveen Talha Battles Encroachers, Now Fights to Save Her Own House

A woman who once took on notorious encroachers is now fighting to save her...

More like this

NAAAR Amended But Not Born— Curious Case Of S. 101A (1A)

The concept of a National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (NAAAR) was introduced to...

No Fixed Validity for Exporter Self-Sealing Permission: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that the permission...

Can You Pay Rent to Your Father and Claim HRA? Rule Changes from April 2026 

House Rent Allowance (HRA) continues to be one of the most widely used tax-saving...