HomeNotificationDelhi Development Authority Can’t Be Treated As Local Authority Under GST law,...

Delhi Development Authority Can’t Be Treated As Local Authority Under GST law, Clarifies FinMin

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Finance Ministry has clarified that Delhi Development Authority (DDA) cannot be treated as local authority under GST law.

It was clarified that DDA does not meet the requirement of local authority as per section 2(69) of the CGST Act, 2017. Thus, as recommended by the 55th GST Council, it is hereby clarified that DDA cannot be treated as local authority under GST law.

Representation has been received from DDA seeking clarification whether DDA is a ‘local authority’ as per section 2(69) of CGST Act, 2017.

As per entry at Sr. No. 5 of notification No. 13/2017-CTR dated 28.06.2017, services supplied by local authority to a business entity are taxable on Reverse Charge (RCM) basis.

Local authority under section 2(69) of the CGST Act, 2017 has been defined as a “Municipal Committee, a Zilla Parishad, a District Board, and any other authority legally entitled to, or entrusted by the Central Government or any State Government with the control or management of a municipal or local fund”

It means an authority which is similar to the elected self-governing body such as Municipal Committee and which is entrusted with the control and management of municipal or local fund can be termed as local authority.

Circular No. 245/02/2025-GST

Date: 28/01/2025

Click Here To Read Circular

Read More: GST Applicable On Services Provided By Facility Management Agency To Municipal Corporation Of Delhi Headquarters, Clarifies FinMin

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRI To Pay Rs. 1 Lakh Cost For Illegal Retention of Seized Cash Beyond Statutory Limit: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has imposed the cost of Rs. 1 Lakh on the...

DGGI Gauhati | Bona Fide Buyer Can’t Be Penalised for Supplier’s Tax Default: High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand of Rs. 78.70 lakh...

Rs. 20 Crore GST ITC Demand Quashed Based on GSTR-2A Mismatch: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has set aside a GST demand relating to alleged excess...

Officer Delegated For Filing Appeal Before GSTAT Can’t Further Sub-Delegate: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has raised serious concerns over the...

More like this

DRI To Pay Rs. 1 Lakh Cost For Illegal Retention of Seized Cash Beyond Statutory Limit: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has imposed the cost of Rs. 1 Lakh on the...

DGGI Gauhati | Bona Fide Buyer Can’t Be Penalised for Supplier’s Tax Default: High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand of Rs. 78.70 lakh...

Rs. 20 Crore GST ITC Demand Quashed Based on GSTR-2A Mismatch: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has set aside a GST demand relating to alleged excess...