HomeGSTGhaziabad Commissionerate: Court Rejects Bail Plea of GST Consultant Accused in Fake...

Ghaziabad Commissionerate: Court Rejects Bail Plea of GST Consultant Accused in Fake ITC Scam

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut rejected the bail application of Deepak Kumar, a Ghaziabad-based consultant arrested in connection with an alleged multi-crore fake GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) scam.

According to the prosecution, Kumar was not merely a consultant but the mastermind controlling a cartel of at least 17 fake firms engaged in circular trading. Investigators claim he orchestrated fraudulent ITC transactions worth nearly ₹29.81 crore and filed refund claims that caused a significant loss to the government.

Searches at his Indirapuram residence and other connected premises allegedly led to the recovery of incriminating material, including electronic devices, rubber stamps of numerous firms, forged documents, and financial records. Officials further claimed Kumar had changed his surname from “Dhembla” to “Kumar” to hide his past, where he had been declared a proclaimed offender in a COFEPOSA-related case.

Kumar’s counsel argued that the arrest was illegal and unconstitutional, asserting that he had been detained for over 30 hours without warrant before being formally arrested. They also stressed that offences under GST are compoundable, with a maximum punishment of five years, and therefore bail should be granted. The defence maintained Kumar was “merely a consultant” with no ownership or operational control over Marvel Impex or other alleged shell firms.

After considering arguments from both sides, the court held that the allegations involved a grave economic offence and that Kumar’s release could affect the investigation. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant accused Deepak Kumar was rejected.

Case Details

Case Title: Deepak Kumar Versus UOI

Case No.: First Bail application No. 4300 of 2025

Date: 02.09.2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Lakshya Kumar Singh

Counsel For Respondent: Parvez Alam 

Read More: No GST On Affiliation And Related Statutory Fees Collected From Colleges: Karnataka High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Penalty for Abetment Can’t Survive After Main Customs Misdeclaration Case Fails: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CBIC Can’t Treat IRS Officer’s Personal Family Disputes as Official Misconduct: Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 25K Cost on Erring Officer for Delaying Litigation

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has delivered a significant judgment...

10% GST Penalty Pre-Deposit Rule Not Applicable Where SCN Issued Before 1 October 2025: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the mandatory 10% pre-deposit for filing appeals...

Rajasthan HC Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Exemplary Costs on CBIC For Vindictive Suspension of IRS Officer

The Rajasthan High Court has imposed the exemplary cost of Rs. 5 Lakh on...

More like this

Penalty for Abetment Can’t Survive After Main Customs Misdeclaration Case Fails: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CBIC Can’t Treat IRS Officer’s Personal Family Disputes as Official Misconduct: Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 25K Cost on Erring Officer for Delaying Litigation

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has delivered a significant judgment...

10% GST Penalty Pre-Deposit Rule Not Applicable Where SCN Issued Before 1 October 2025: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the mandatory 10% pre-deposit for filing appeals...