HomeGSTAllahabad High Court Imposes Rs. 20,000 Cost On Joint Commissioner SGST For...

Allahabad High Court Imposes Rs. 20,000 Cost On Joint Commissioner SGST For Not Giving  Opportunity Of Hearing 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has imposed Rs. 20,000 Cost on Joint Commissioner, SGST for passing the order passed without giving hearing opportunity to assessee.

The bench of Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Kshitij Shailendra has observed that conduct on the part of the officers of the State wherein besides denying opportunity of personal hearing in the show cause notice by indicating ‘NA’ in the column pertaining to date of personal hearing, despite specific prayer made for providing opportunity of hearing in reply, the order has been passed without affording any opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner is engaged in manufacture and supply of potato flakes besides other items. A show cause notice for the period July 2017 to March 2018, proposing to classify the product in question i.e. potato flakes under tariff heading 2005-2000 instead of 1105-2000 was issued. In the notice, the date by which the reply was required to be submitted was indicated as 19.08.2024 and in column pertaining to date of personal hearing ‘NA’ was indicated and the same was the position pertaining to column pertaining to time of personal hearing order has been passed without affording any opportunity of hearing.

A reply to the notice was filed by the petitioner contesting the allegations. In the reply, a specific prayer was made on behalf of the petitioner that no adverse order to the prejudice of the petitioner be passed without affording him an opportunity of hearing.

The court allowed the writ petition. The order is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Joint Commissioner SGST for passing a fresh order after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

Case Details

Case Title: Merino Industries Ltd. Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and another

Case No.: Writ Tax No. – 1406 Of 2025

Date: 2.4.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Anil Prakash Mathur

Counsel For Respondent: Ankur Agarwal

Read More: Customs Dept. Not Justified In Detaining Personal Gold Jewellery: Delhi High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Modvat Credit Can’t Be Denied Without Evidence of Diversion or Non-Use of Inputs: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...

Language Training for Employment Qualifies as ‘Vocational Training’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has ruled that...

CESTAT Remands Customs Classification Dispute on GPON Telecom Equipment for Fresh Examination

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench has set aside...

Family Courts Can Admit Electronic Evidence Without Strict Evidence Act Compliance: Gujarat High Court 

The Gujarat High Court has held that family courts have the authority to admit...

More like this

Modvat Credit Can’t Be Denied Without Evidence of Diversion or Non-Use of Inputs: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...

Language Training for Employment Qualifies as ‘Vocational Training’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has ruled that...

CESTAT Remands Customs Classification Dispute on GPON Telecom Equipment for Fresh Examination

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench has set aside...