Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCoconut Oil Classification: Madras HC Remits Rs. 374 Crore GST Demand Against...

Coconut Oil Classification: Madras HC Remits Rs. 374 Crore GST Demand Against Marico Back to Dept. After SC Ruling

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Coconut Oil Classification: Madras HC Remits Rs. 374 Crore GST Demand Against Marico Back to Dept. After SC Ruling

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has remitted a high-stakes GST classification dispute involving Marico Limited back to the tax authorities, following a recent ruling of the Supreme Court of India clarifying the principles for classification of coconut oil. The bench of Justice C. Saravanan disposed of a writ petition filed by Marico challenging Show Cause Notice…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Gold Worth Rs. 35.21 Lakh Hidden in Trolley Bag Linings Seized at Delhi Airport

Delhi Customs officers foiled a gold smuggling attempt at Indira Gandhi International Airport after...
GST

Proof Of Tax Evasion Not Required For Expired E-Way Bill Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur, has held that the department...
GST

Payment To Release Goods Doesn’t Waive Right To Challenge GST Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur Bench, has held that payment...
GST

Intent To Evade Tax Not Required For Expired E-Way Bill Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur Bench, has upheld a penalty...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Gold Worth Rs. 35.21 Lakh Hidden in Trolley Bag Linings Seized at Delhi Airport

Delhi Customs officers foiled a gold smuggling attempt at Indira Gandhi International Airport after...
GST

Proof Of Tax Evasion Not Required For Expired E-Way Bill Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur, has held that the department...
GST

Payment To Release Goods Doesn’t Waive Right To Challenge GST Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur Bench, has held that payment...