Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMere Claim of Coercion Not Enough, But ITC Reversal During Inspection Raises...

Mere Claim of Coercion Not Enough, But ITC Reversal During Inspection Raises Doubt: Karnataka High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has held that a mere allegation of coercion is not enough to invalidate tax payments made under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act. However, the Court also recognized that Input Tax Credit (ITC) reversal carried out during an ongoing inspection may indicate lack of voluntariness, warranting closer scrutiny. The…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

GST Penalty Can’t Rest Solely On Seller Not Generating E-Way Bill In Valid Bill-To/Ship-To Deal: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur, has allowed assessee’s appeal against...

Alleged Coercive GST Recovery Of ₹1.96 Crore: Supreme Court Grants 4 Weeks To Appeal Refund Rejection

The Supreme Court has granted a coaching institute operator four weeks to file a...

GST on Electrical Items: Rates, Key Notifications and Latest Developments

Electrical items do not attract a uniform GST rate in India. Most commonly used...

GST Registration Under Rule 14A

Rule 14A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 provides an optional,...

More like this

GST Penalty Can’t Rest Solely On Seller Not Generating E-Way Bill In Valid Bill-To/Ship-To Deal: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur, has allowed assessee’s appeal against...

Alleged Coercive GST Recovery Of ₹1.96 Crore: Supreme Court Grants 4 Weeks To Appeal Refund Rejection

The Supreme Court has granted a coaching institute operator four weeks to file a...

GST on Electrical Items: Rates, Key Notifications and Latest Developments

Electrical items do not attract a uniform GST rate in India. Most commonly used...