Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCGST Kochi Commissionerate Imposes Rs.117.52 Crore ITC Penalty On IndiGo

CGST Kochi Commissionerate Imposes Rs.117.52 Crore ITC Penalty On IndiGo

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

IndiGo on Tuesday disclosed that it has been issued a penalty demand of Rs. 117.52 crore by the Joint Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise under the CGST Kochi Commissionerate, Kerala, over alleged wrongful input tax credit (ITC) claims. The demand covers the period from 2018–19 to 2021–22.

In a regulatory filing, the airline said the tax authorities have disallowed the ITC it had availed during the relevant years and passed a demand order along with penalty. IndiGo, however, disputed the findings, maintaining that the order is legally unsound.

“The company believes that the order passed by the authorities is erroneous. Further, the company believes that it has a strong case on merits, backed by advice from external tax advisors,” IndiGo stated in its filing.

The airline confirmed that it will challenge the order before the appropriate appellate authority. It also clarified that the dispute does not have any significant impact on its financials, ongoing operations, or business activities.

Following the announcement, IndiGo’s stock declined by 1.60% to end the day at ₹5,697.70 per share.

The development comes at a time when several entities across sectors are seeing tightened scrutiny of GST-related compliance. IndiGo expressed confidence that the matter will be resolved favourably at the appellate stage.

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...