Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCentre Moves Supreme Court with Curative Petition Against Verdict on Mineral Taxation...

Centre Moves Supreme Court with Curative Petition Against Verdict on Mineral Taxation Rights

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Centre has filed a curative petition in the Supreme Court challenging last year’s landmark judgment that vested the power to levy taxes on mineral rights exclusively with the States. 

The move marks yet another attempt by the Union government to reclaim legislative competence over mineral taxation, which it argues is vital for maintaining uniformity in the country’s fiscal and economic framework.

The development was brought to the notice of a bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on Tuesday. “We have filed a curative petition with all seriousness,” he stated, emphasizing that the Centre considers the issue of national importance.

Background of the Dispute

On July 25, 2024, a nine-judge Constitution bench led by former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud delivered an 8:1 majority verdict, holding that Parliament does not possess the legislative competence to impose taxes on mineral rights under Entry 54 of List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. This entry empowers Parliament only to legislate on the regulation of mines and mineral development in the public interest, leaving taxation powers with the States.

The ruling significantly curtailed the Centre’s authority, reaffirming that taxation on mineral rights falls under the exclusive domain of State legislatures. Several mineral-rich States, which had long been asserting their fiscal rights, hailed the judgment as a boost to cooperative federalism and financial autonomy.

Earlier Attempts and Legal Journey

Following the July 2024 verdict, the Centre had moved review petitions seeking reconsideration of the judgment. However, the Supreme Court dismissed those pleas, reiterating the clarity of its constitutional interpretation.

The filing of the curative petition – the final judicial remedy available after review petitions are exhausted – indicates the Centre’s determination to reopen the debate on mineral taxation powers.

Read More: GSTN Notifies New Changes in Invoice Management System

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...