Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCentre To Give Affidavit on Vacant GSTAT Posts Across UP: Allahabad High...

Centre To Give Affidavit on Vacant GSTAT Posts Across UP: Allahabad High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has expressed serious concern over the large number of vacancies in the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) benches functioning across Uttar Pradesh and has directed the Union Government to place on record the concrete steps being taken to fill the sanctioned posts. 

The bench of Justice Piyush Agrawal observed that the effective functioning of the GSTAT cannot be ensured unless the existing vacancies are filled expeditiously. 

Pursuant to an earlier direction, Saurabh Suman Shardool, Registrar of the GST Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, appeared before the High Court and filed an affidavit detailing the sanctioned and working strength of staff at the GSTAT benches established in Uttar Pradesh. The Court took the affidavit on record and examined the staffing position across the benches situated at Lucknow, Prayagraj, Ghaziabad, Varanasi and Agra. 

Buy Now: 500+ CGST Notifications (2017–2025) | Clickable Index E-Magazine | Hyperlinked Original PDFs

The affidavit revealed that each GSTAT bench is functioning with substantial staff shortages. While some key administrative posts have been filled, numerous positions—including Court Officers, Legal Assistants, Stenographers, Lower Division Clerks (LDCs), Multi-Tasking Staff (MTS), and Personal Staff—remain vacant.

The Lucknow Bench, for instance, has vacancies in several operational posts, including Court Officers, Senior Personal Secretary, LDCs, Steno-II personnel and MTS staff. Similar shortages were recorded in the Prayagraj, Ghaziabad, Varanasi and Agra benches, with several sanctioned posts either lying vacant or appointments having been issued but the selected candidates had yet to join. The affidavit also stated that certain posts are being filled through the tendering process wherever applicable. 

After examining the staffing details, the Court observed that a large number of vacancies continue to exist in every GSTAT Bench in Uttar Pradesh, raising concerns over the Tribunal’s ability to function effectively and provide timely adjudication of GST disputes. 

When questioned by the Court, the Additional Solicitor General submitted that the process of filling the sanctioned posts is underway and that appointments are subject to the approval of the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. 

Not satisfied with the general explanation, the High Court directed that an affidavit be filed by an officer of the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, not below the rank of Secretary, Additional Secretary or Joint Secretary, setting out the specific efforts being undertaken to fill the sanctioned posts in the GSTAT benches across Uttar Pradesh. The Court sought a clear account of the measures being taken to operationalise the Tribunal with adequate staffing. 

The High Court listed the matter for 13 August 2026 for further consideration. It also directed that the interim order granted earlier shall continue until the next date of hearing. Additionally, the Court exempted the personal appearance of the GSTAT Registrar, Saurabh Suman Shardool, until the next listing.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Madras High Court Upholds GST Portal Service of Orders

Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...