HomeGSTCBIC Issues Corrigendum Clarifying "Any property" To Mean "Any Immovable Property", For...

CBIC Issues Corrigendum Clarifying “Any property” To Mean “Any Immovable Property”, For Renting Commercial Property Under RCM

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued a Corrigendum dated October 22, 2024 to Notification No. 09/2024-Central Tax (Rate) dated October 08, 2024, clarified that “any property” should be read as “any immovable property”, for renting of commercial property by an unregistered person to a registered person under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to prevent revenue leakage.

“In the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.09/2024-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 8th October, 2024, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 623(E), dated the 8th October, 2024, at page number 24, against serial number 5AB, in the table, in column (2) in the line 12, for “any property” read “any immovable property”,” the notification read.

Corrigendum

Notification No. 09/2024-Central Tax (Rate) dated October 08, 2024

The Government has notified the (reverse charge mechanism) RCM on renting of property other than residential dwelling by unregistered person to registered with effect from 10 October 2024.

The RCM on commercial property is also implemented from 10th October 2024 if supplier/Landlord is unregistered.

For businesses renting commercial properties, this means an added layer of compliance, with tenants needing to manage GST payments themselves. Tenants must ensure accurate GST filings and payments, as non-compliance could result in penalties. 

The clarification on Preferential Location Charges (PLC) being taxed at the same rate as construction services is essential for those dealing with premium real estate offerings.

Corrigendum Details

F. No. 190354/149/2024

Date: 22/10/2024

Click Here To Read Notification

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CGST Delhi South Commissionerate Arrests Smartphone Trader’s Director in Rs. 60.59 Crore Fake ITC Fraud

The Anti-Evasion Branch of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST), Delhi South Commissionerate,...

Call Centre Services Provided to Foreign Client Qualify as Export: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...

Lapses by Fino Payments Bank | DGGI Highlights Due Diligence Failures, Shell Entity Onboarding and Alleged Rs. 3,000 Crore Transaction Routing

In the ongoing investigation into a multi-crore illegal online betting network, the Directorate General...

Nashik SGST Officials Arrested in Rs. 1 Crore Bribery Case

In a significant anti-corruption action, Somnath Dattu Page and Machhindra Vitthal Donde, officials of...

More like this

CGST Delhi South Commissionerate Arrests Smartphone Trader’s Director in Rs. 60.59 Crore Fake ITC Fraud

The Anti-Evasion Branch of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST), Delhi South Commissionerate,...

Call Centre Services Provided to Foreign Client Qualify as Export: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...

Lapses by Fino Payments Bank | DGGI Highlights Due Diligence Failures, Shell Entity Onboarding and Alleged Rs. 3,000 Crore Transaction Routing

In the ongoing investigation into a multi-crore illegal online betting network, the Directorate General...