The Gauhati High Court has continued interim protection to assessee company and its director in a writ petition challenging summons issued under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. The bench of Justice Arun Dev Choudhury directed the GST department to produce records to justify the issuance of summons in…
Can GST Dept. Repeatedly Summon Company Director Despite Cooperation? Gauhati HC Examines Scope of S. 70 Powers
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
- Tags
- Company Director
Latest articles
Other Laws
Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor
The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...
Other Laws
Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme CourtÂ
The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...
Other Laws
Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation
The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...
Other Laws
Centre Must Apply Mind Before Refusing VRS: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of IPS Officer’s Voluntary Retirement
The Supreme Court has held that while the Central Government has the final authority...
More like this
Other Laws
Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor
The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...
Other Laws
Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme CourtÂ
The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...
Other Laws
Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation
The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...

