HomeGSTGSTAT Directs CA Certificate, ITC Register in Dispute Over Truck ITC and...

GSTAT Directs CA Certificate, ITC Register in Dispute Over Truck ITC and Cross-Financial-Year Credit Claims

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has directed an assessee to furnish a Chartered Accountant (CA) certificate and a detailed Input Tax Credit (ITC) register in a case involving disputed ITC claimed on a truck and the availment of credit across different financial years. 

The bench of Sanjaykumar Dwivedi (Judicial Member) and Ramesh Kumar Gokalbhai Hadvani (Technical Member) sought additional documentary evidence to verify the taxpayer’s claims before proceeding further. 

One of the principal issues before the Tribunal relates to the availment of ITC on a truck. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant submitted that although the company had initially claimed depreciation under the Income-tax Act on the GST component of the vehicle, the mistake was subsequently rectified by filing a revised Income Tax Return. According to the appellant, the depreciation attributable to the tax element is no longer being claimed, thereby removing the bar against claiming ITC under the GST law. 

Buy Now: 130 GST Judgments – E-Magazine July 2026

Recognizing that this assertion required independent verification, the Tribunal directed the appellant to submit a certificate from a Chartered Accountant confirming that depreciation on the tax component has not been claimed. 

The second issue concerns the timing of ITC availment. The appellant contended that certain tax invoices or documents pertaining to one financial year had been utilized for claiming credit in another financial year. To examine the correctness of this contention, the Tribunal ordered the appellant to produce an ITC Register containing a comprehensive list of all documents against which ITC had been claimed in the two financial years involved. 

The direction indicates that the Bench intends to verify the chronology of the credit claims and determine whether the ITC was availed in accordance with the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the applicable procedural requirements. 

The GSTAT directed that both the Chartered Accountant’s certificate and the ITC Register must be filed on or before 18 August 2026. The Tribunal also instructed that copies of these documents be supplied to the respondent’s Authorized Representative to ensure that both sides have access to the evidence before the next hearing. 

After issuing the directions for production of additional evidence, the Tribunal adjourned the matter and listed it for further hearing on 1 September 2026, when it is expected to consider the documents filed and proceed with adjudication of the ITC-related issues.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: 2022 Rule Excluding Duty Credit Scrips From Exempt Turnover Can’t Apply Retrospectively; S. 74 SCN Unsustainable Without Proof of Fraud or Wilful Suppression: GSTAT

Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

UNICEF’s IGST Refund Claims Within Time, CESTAT Rules Limitation Starts From 2019 Customs Circular

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...

Karnataka HC Records ASG Assurance That CISF Will Furnish Complete CCTV Footage to Ranya Rao in Gold Smuggling Case

The Karnataka High Court has recorded an assurance from Additional Solicitor General Arvind Kamath...

Showroom Interior Fit-Outs Constitutes “Original Works”, CESTAT Quashes ₹2.61 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside...

CESTAT Upholds Rs. 7.24 Cr. Customs Demand in PCB Undervaluation Case

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

More like this

UNICEF’s IGST Refund Claims Within Time, CESTAT Rules Limitation Starts From 2019 Customs Circular

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...

Karnataka HC Records ASG Assurance That CISF Will Furnish Complete CCTV Footage to Ranya Rao in Gold Smuggling Case

The Karnataka High Court has recorded an assurance from Additional Solicitor General Arvind Kamath...

Showroom Interior Fit-Outs Constitutes “Original Works”, CESTAT Quashes ₹2.61 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside...