HomeGSTBritannia Receives Rs. 25 Crore GST Demand Order for Product Classification, ITC...

Britannia Receives Rs. 25 Crore GST Demand Order for Product Classification, ITC Dispute

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Britannia Industries has disclosed that it has received a tax demand order of more than Rs. 25 crore from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities over issues related to product classification and input tax credit (ITC).

In a regulatory filing, the company stated that the Additional Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax & Central Excise (CGST & CX), Kolkata North, has passed an order covering the tax periods from July 2017 to March 2023.

The order demands tax amounting to Rs. 25,41,73,150, along with an equivalent penalty and applicable interest. The demand stems from a show cause notice issued by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) on August 3, 2024.

The dispute primarily concerns the classification of a specific product sold by Britannia and the eligibility of input tax credit claimed on certain goods.

Britannia Industries clarified that the order is appealable and stated, “The company will take all necessary actions, including availing legal remedies as provided under the GST law.”

Read More: CERA Accused of Misusing Audit Authority, Coercing GST Officers to Illegally Scrutinize Private Assessees

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...