Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNo Change in Auto-Population of ITC: GSTN Alerts Against Fake News 

No Change in Auto-Population of ITC: GSTN Alerts Against Fake News 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has issued the advisory on IMS as there are some posts circulating incorrect information regarding changes in GST return filing from October 1, 2025.

The GSTN has clarified that there is no Change in Auto-Population of ITC. Input Tax Credit (ITC) will continue to auto-populate from GSTR-2B to GSTR-3B without any manual intervention. The mechanism of auto-population remains unchanged due to the implementation of the Invoice Management System (IMS).

The GSTN stated that GSTR-2B will continue to be generated automatically on the 14th of every month, without any manual intervention by taxpayers or based on the actions taken by the taxpayers. Taxpayers can take actions in IMS even after generation of GSTR-2B till filing of GSTR-3B and can regenerate GSTR-2B accordingly, if required.

While referring to Credit Note Handling (Effective October 2025 period onward), the GSTN clarified that recipient taxpayers will have the option to keep a Credit Note or related document pending for a specified period. On acceptance of Credit Note or related document, the recipient will also have the flexibility to reduce ITC only to the extent of its availment by adjusting the reversal amount manually.

Click Here To Read Advisory

Read More: DGGI Slaps Rs. 414.88 Crore Show-Cause Notice on Infosys Over Alleged Ineligible GST Refunds for Exported Services

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Customs Can’t Replace Declared CIF Value With FOB Figure in Non-GMO Certificate Without Proof of Extra Payment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has ruled that Customs...

Supplier’s Wrong Shipment Can’t Be Treated as Importer’s Customs Misdeclaration: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Quarterly Export Refund Limitation Runs From End of Quarter in Which FIRC Is Received: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has held that the...

DGFT’s Export Obligation Discharge Certificate Bars Customs Demand Over EPCG Car Import: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside customs...

More like this

Customs Can’t Replace Declared CIF Value With FOB Figure in Non-GMO Certificate Without Proof of Extra Payment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has ruled that Customs...

Supplier’s Wrong Shipment Can’t Be Treated as Importer’s Customs Misdeclaration: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Quarterly Export Refund Limitation Runs From End of Quarter in Which FIRC Is Received: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has held that the...