Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTAdjudication Of Multiple Show Cause Notices In GST By Single Adjudicating Authority:...

Adjudication Of Multiple Show Cause Notices In GST By Single Adjudicating Authority: Kerala GST Dept.

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala GST department has notified that adjudication of multiple show cause notices in GST by single adjudicating authority.

There can be situations wherein multiple taxpayers are identified to be involved with respect to a particular issue. In respect of show cause notices issued by officers of the Intelligence and Enforcement Vertical, there may be cases where the principal places of business of notices fall under the jurisdiction of multiple adjudicating authorities. There can also be situations where multiple show cause notices are issued on the same issue to different notices, having the same PAN but different GSTINs and their principal places of business fall under the jurisdiction of multiple adjudicating

authorities.

When such a situation arises, the present procedure followed is to transfer the case related to each taxpayer involved in the issue to the respective adjudicating authority after issuance of SCN by the proper officer concerned.

This results in a scenario where multiple authorities adjudicate on the same issue, potentially leading to legal challenges. To prevent such inconsistencies, a single adjudicating authority shall henceforth handle all adjudications in such situations, ensuring uniformity and consistency in decision-making.

For the purpose of adjudication in such scenarios, the Joint Commissioners of Taxpayer Services are empowered with state-wide jurisdiction. 

When multiple taxpayers across the state are identified to be involved and interconnected in a single detected issue, such show cause notices may be adjudicated, regardless of the amount involved, by the Joint Commissioners of Taxpayer Services.

The Show Cause Notices issued by any vertical which require a common adjudicating authority shall be made answerable to the Taxpayer Services Joint Commissioners in the following manner regardless of the amount involved.

Where the principal place of business of the noticee, having the highest amount of demand of tax or penalty in the said show cause notice, falls in a particular district, then the notices issued to all other interconnected notices, whose principal places of business may fall under the jurisdiction of multiple adjudicating authorities, shall be adjudicated by the. Joint Commissioner of Taxpayer Services of that specific district.

In situations where multiple taxpayers involved in a single issue are identified to be located in the same district, but under the jurisdiction of

different adjudicating authorities, to bring uniformity in adjudication, irrespective of the amount involved, all SCNs shall be adjudicated by the

Joint Commissioner of Taxpayer Services vertical of that district.

Read More: Seized Gold Cannot Be Absolutely Confiscated For Mere Invalid LOA; Doesn’t Falls Under Customs Officers’s Jurisdiction: CESTAT

Circular Details

Circular No. :21/2024-Kerala SGST

Date: 18/11/2024

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...