Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTRs. 700 Crore GST Evasion: Jaipur Special Economic Offence Court Grants Bail 

Rs. 700 Crore GST Evasion: Jaipur Special Economic Offence Court Grants Bail 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Special Economic Offence Court of Jaipur, Rajasthan, has granted bail to Ghasi Lal Chaudhary in connection with the alleged Rs. 700 crore GST evasion case. 

The bench of Judge Sunil Kumar Meena, had reserved the order on February 27, 2025, and pronounced the bail decision on February 28.

Rs. 700 Crore GST Evasion Case: Key Developments

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Jaipur, uncovered a massive GST fraud, seizing evidence of Rs. 700 crore tax evasion during extensive raids at 15 locations across Rajasthan, including Bhilwara, Jaipur, Udaipur, and Sikar. The raids resulted in the arrest of seven individuals, including Ghasi Lal Chaudhary from Jaipur, Kesardev Sharma, and scrap dealer Arun Jindal, on February 19, 2025.

DGGI’s investigation revealed records of 13 lakh tons of iron and steel goods being supplied without tax compliance, with an estimated market value of Rs. 4,000 crore. Authorities suspect that the GST evasion network extends beyond Rajasthan, potentially operating in Haryana and Punjab through fake companies to evade taxes.

Defense Argument in GST Evasion Case

During the bail hearing, Advocate Sumit Gehlot, representing Ghasi Lal Chaudhary, contended that his client had been falsely implicated, with no incriminating evidence found during DGGI’s searches of his office and residence.

Gehlot emphasized that his client had no direct links to the main accused—Mahavir Trading, Rumjan Sarajuddin Shah, Manoj Vijay, Naveen Yadav, and Rajeev Yadav—and was neither a director, partner, nor beneficiary in any of their firms. The only evidence cited against Ghasi Lal was an Excel sheet allegedly recovered from the main accused’s premises, listing bill details from September 2023 to February 2025 related to his firm, Nirman Infra Pvt. Ltd. However, the defense argued that DGGI itself admitted the document was provided by an unidentified informer, raising doubts about its credibility.

Court’s Decision and Ongoing Investigation

Despite DGGI’s opposition, which claimed that the accused were part of a larger GST fraud network, the Jaipur Special Economic Offence Court granted bail to Ghasi Lal Chaudhary. The investigation into the Rs. 700 crore GST scam is still ongoing as authorities delve deeper into the tax evasion racket that has raised concerns in the iron and steel sector.

Stay tuned for the latest updates on the GST fraud case, tax evasion news, and financial crime investigations in India.

Read More: Alleged Artificial Division Of Units To Claim Separate SSI Exemptions : CESTAT Quashes Central Excise Duty Demand

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...