HomeGST56th GST Council to Review Disparity as Central GST Outperforms States in...

56th GST Council to Review Disparity as Central GST Outperforms States in Per GSTIN Collections

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Centre has outpaced States in per-GSTIN collections for April, despite having significantly fewer GST registrations, sparking debate ahead of the next GST Council meeting.

According to GST portal data, the Centre recorded ₹89,075 crore in gross GST collections from 63.2 lakh GSTINs, averaging ₹1.4 lakh per GSTIN. In comparison, States collectively collected ₹1,00,729 crore from 88.5 lakh GSTINs, averaging a lower ₹1.14 lakh per GSTIN.

Among the major States, Haryana topped the per-GSTIN collection chart at ₹3.04 lakh, followed by Maharashtra (₹2.56 lakh), and Karnataka (₹2.09 lakh). Uttar Pradesh, which has the highest number of GSTINs at over 10.8 lakh, recorded the lowest per-GSTIN collection of ₹0.65 lakh.

The issue is expected to be taken up by the Revenue Augmentation wing of the GST Council. Observers emphasize the need for equitable treatment of taxpayers, regardless of whether they fall under the Centre or State jurisdiction.

Read More: Operation Sindoor: India’s Precision Strikes Against Terror Camps in Pakistan and PoK (May 2025)

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...

Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

More like this

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...

GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...