Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGST5% vs 18% GST Dispute: After Caramel Popcorn GST Controversy, Donut Taxation...

5% vs 18% GST Dispute: After Caramel Popcorn GST Controversy, Donut Taxation Dispute Heats Up:  Bombay High Court Halts GST Recovery Against Mad Over Donuts 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court is set to determine the appropriate Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate applicable to donuts and cakes, specifically whether they should be taxed at 5% under restaurant services or at 18% as bakery products. 

The case is being heard by a bench comprising Justice BP Colabawalla and Justice FP Pooniwalla on whether the supply of donuts falls within the ambit of restaurant services under Service Accounting Code (SAC) 9963 or should be categorised as a bakery product subject to separate tax treatment under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework.

This legal scrutiny follows a show-cause notice issued by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) to Mad Over Donuts (MOD), demanding approximately ₹100 crore in tax dues. The notice asserts that MOD should have applied an 18% GST rate on the sale of donuts and other bakery items, as opposed to the 5% rate associated with restaurant services. 

In response, MOD has filed a petition challenging the notice, leading the Bombay High Court to intervene. The court has currently restrained authorities from taking any coercive recovery actions against the company.

The core issue lies in the classification of donuts and similar bakery products under the GST framework. If categorized under restaurant services, these items attract a 5% GST rate. Conversely, if deemed bakery products, they are subject to an 18% GST rate. The court’s decision will have significant implications for the taxation of such products, potentially affecting pricing and compliance strategies within the food and beverage industry.

This case underscores the complexities businesses face in navigating GST classifications and the broader impact of such disputes on the industry. The outcome of this legal battle is anticipated to set a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Hitesh Foods (Mad Over Donuts) was represented by Advocate Abhishek A Rastogi.

After Caramel Popcorn GST Controversy, Donuts Come Under Scanner

Following the recent caramel popcorn GST classification debate, where authorities contested its tax rate, a similar controversy is brewing over donuts. Tax officials argue that donuts, including specialty variants like caramel popcorn donuts, should be classified as bakery items subject to 18% GST. Meanwhile, MOD maintains that its products should be taxed at the lower 5% rate applicable to restaurant services.

With the Bombay High Court stepping in, the food industry awaits a crucial verdict that could reshape GST norms for bakery and confectionery products.

Read More: Detailed Analysis of the Income Tax Act: Key Sections for Taxpayers and Businesses

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Importer Alleges Backdated DIN In Arrest Documents: Mumbai Court Grants Bail In ₹31.86 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to an importer accused of evading approximately ₹31.86...

Dept. Can’t Challenge Fine Alone While Leaving Related Penalty Findings Uncontested: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra State Bench, has summarily dismissed...

GST On Mining Royalty: Gujarat High Court Bars Final Orders Without Its Permission, Allows Adjudication To Continue

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection in a batch of petitions challenging...

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

More like this

Importer Alleges Backdated DIN In Arrest Documents: Mumbai Court Grants Bail In ₹31.86 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to an importer accused of evading approximately ₹31.86...

Dept. Can’t Challenge Fine Alone While Leaving Related Penalty Findings Uncontested: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra State Bench, has summarily dismissed...

GST On Mining Royalty: Gujarat High Court Bars Final Orders Without Its Permission, Allows Adjudication To Continue

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection in a batch of petitions challenging...