HomeGSTGST | 2 Demand Notices Can’t Be Created For One Order: Allahabad...

GST | 2 Demand Notices Can’t Be Created For One Order: Allahabad HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has held that two demand notices cannot be created for one order under GST. The Bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Vivek Saran provided relief to Lava International Limited by permitting it to file a single statutory appeal against a GST adjudication order, while questioning the adjudicating authority’s decision…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Municipal Water Services Exempt Under Mega Exemption Notification: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 3.60 Crore Excise Demand; R. 8(3A)-Based Recovery Held Unsustainable

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor

The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...

Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...

More like this

Municipal Water Services Exempt Under Mega Exemption Notification: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 3.60 Crore Excise Demand; R. 8(3A)-Based Recovery Held Unsustainable

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor

The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...