Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGST18% GST On Electric Bus Operations Under Cost Contract; ‘Electricity’ Not ‘Fuel’...

18% GST On Electric Bus Operations Under Cost Contract; ‘Electricity’ Not ‘Fuel’ for Concessional Entry: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that services relating to operation and maintenance of electric buses under a gross cost contract are liable to GST at 18%, rejecting the applicability of concessional rates available to motor vehicle rentals where fuel cost is included.

The applicant was engaged in providing end-to-end services for electric buses, including operation, maintenance, and charging infrastructure under a public transport project.

The applicant operated electric buses under a Gross Cost Contract (GCC) model, receiving fixed consideration based on per kilometre operations. The buses were deployed under a government-backed initiative promoting electric mobility, with responsibilities including procurement, operation, and maintenance.

The AAR observed that the services involved rental/operational services of buses with drivers, classifiable under SAC 996601, covering “rental services of transport vehicles with operators”.

The primary issue before the AAR was whether the services could fall under Entry No. 10(i) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which provides concessional GST rates (5%/12%) where cost of fuel is included in consideration.

The applicant argued that electricity used in charging electric buses should qualify as “fuel,” thereby making the concessional entry applicable.

Rejecting this argument, the AAR undertook a detailed interpretation of the term “fuel”. It held that fuel traditionally refers to substances that release energy through combustion (e.g., petrol, diesel, gas). Electricity, on the other hand, is an energy carrier, not a combustible substance. Electric buses derive energy from stored electrical power and not from combustion-based fuels.

The authority emphasised that “electricity” cannot be equated with “fuel” either scientifically or in common parlance, and therefore cannot satisfy the condition of inclusion of fuel cost under the concessional entry.

Based on this interpretation, the AAR concluded that the services provided are rental services of electrically operated vehicles with operators. Since electricity does not qualify as fuel, the condition under Entry 10(i) is not met. Consequently, the services fall under residual Entry 10(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017, attracting GST at 18%.

The AAR ruled that concessional GST rates under Entry 10(i) are not applicable to services involving electric buses. Such services are taxable at 18% under the residual entry, irrespective of inclusion of electricity costs in consideration.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: M/s. JBM Ecolife Mobility Surat P Ltd

Citation: JURISHOUR-1086-AAR-2026(GUJ) 

Ruling Date: 28/04/2026

Read More: Coaching for School Students Taxable at 18% GST as ‘Supplementary Education’: AAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Waiver Application Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Missing DRC-03A If Tax Was Already Paid: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application for...

GST Notice Issued After Regular Assessment Deadline Stayed as Court Questions Basis for Invoking S. 74: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has granted an interim stay in appeal against a GST...

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Alone Can’t Undo Rs. 76,750 ITC Relief: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Lucknow Bench has dismissed a departmental...

Govt. to Evaluate RoSCTL and RoDTEP Export Schemes Amid Changing Global Trade Conditions

NITI Aayog’s proposed study will examine whether the two tax remission schemes are helping...

More like this

GST Waiver Application Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Missing DRC-03A If Tax Was Already Paid: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application for...

GST Notice Issued After Regular Assessment Deadline Stayed as Court Questions Basis for Invoking S. 74: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has granted an interim stay in appeal against a GST...

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Alone Can’t Undo Rs. 76,750 ITC Relief: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Lucknow Bench has dismissed a departmental...