Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxWrongful Rejection of SVLDR Declaration Would Push Decade-Long Tax Litigation, Denying Dept....

Wrongful Rejection of SVLDR Declaration Would Push Decade-Long Tax Litigation, Denying Dept. Immediate Recovery: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has ruled that the tax department wrongly rejected a hospitality firm’s application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, on the ground of “quantification,” observing that upholding the rejection would force the company into a prolonged chain of appeals stretching over a decade and denying the department the benefit of immediate recovery.

A division bench comprising Justice M. S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain held that the rejection suffered from serious procedural lapses. 

The bench noted that the company had quantified and admitted liability in writing on June 11, 2019, which was before the statutory cut-off date. The rejection order was passed without giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, violating Section 127 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019. If authorities had communicated their calculation of ₹1.06 crore as tax liability, the petitioner could have accepted it and availed the scheme.

The petitioner company, engaged in outdoor catering services, had admitted to defaults in payment of service tax due to financial difficulties. Investigations by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) revealed a liability of over ₹69 lakh for the period 2014–2018, of which part had already been deposited.

In June 2019—before the cut-off date under the SVLDR Scheme—the company quantified its tax dues and expressed willingness to settle. However, when it formally applied under the scheme in December 2019, the authorities rejected the declaration, citing that liability had not been “quantified” before the June 30, 2019 cut-off.

The case involved Venture Professional Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., a Thane-based catering services provider, which had challenged the February 2020 rejection of its application under the SVLDR Scheme. The scheme, introduced by the Union Government in 2019, sought to settle pending service tax and excise disputes by allowing assessees to pay a portion of admitted liabilities in return for immunity from penalties and prosecution.

The court while setting aside the rejection, directed  that tax dues be recalculated at ₹1.06 crore, subject to deduction of the petitioner’s pre-deposit of ₹29.72 lakh. The balance amount would carry 9% annual interest from April 1, 2020 until final payment. Department must communicate the revised payable amount within four weeks, and the petitioner must pay it within six weeks of such communication. A final discharge certificate under the scheme will be issued within four weeks of payment confirmation.

Case Details

Case Title: Venture Professional Hospitality  Versus UOI

Case No.: WRIT PETITION NO.3383 OF 2022

Date: 4 September 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Mr. Shreyas Shrivastava a/w Mr. Saurabh R. Mashelkar

Counsel For Respondent:  J. B. Mishra a/w Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Mr. Ashutosh Mishra & Mr. J. B. Mishra a/w Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Mr. Ashutosh Mishra & Mr. Rupesh Dubey

Read More: Big GST Rate Revision: What to Buy Before September 22 and What to Wait For

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...

CBDT Revises Valuer and Income-tax Practitioner Forms, Extends Key Deadlines

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the Income-tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules,...

More like this

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...