Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxSupreme Court Strikes Down 25-Year Experience Rule for CAs Seeking ITAT Membership

Supreme Court Strikes Down 25-Year Experience Rule for CAs Seeking ITAT Membership

Direct Tax

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Supreme Court Strikes Down 25-Year Experience Rule for CAs Seeking ITAT Membership

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has formally inserted additional paragraphs into its November 19 judgment in the Madras Bar Association batch of petitions, striking down the requirement of 25 years of experience for Chartered Accountants (CAs) to qualify for appointment as Accountant/Technical Members of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The Court declared the provision invalid and…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Excise Commissioner Dares to Record Contrary View to CESTAT: Gujarat HC Warns Adjudicating Authority

The Gujarat High Court has set aside orders passed by the adjudicating authority and...
Direct Tax

S. 143(1) Intimation Issued After Scrutiny Notice U/s 143(2) Void Ab Initio: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench, has held that an intimation issued...
Direct Tax

S. 151 Approval Failed to Consider Assessee’s Reply: Calcutta High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice 

The Calcutta High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2017-18 after...
GST

Retrospective S. 16(5) ITC Benefit Can’t Be Denied: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order involving a demand of...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Excise Commissioner Dares to Record Contrary View to CESTAT: Gujarat HC Warns Adjudicating Authority

The Gujarat High Court has set aside orders passed by the adjudicating authority and...
Direct Tax

S. 143(1) Intimation Issued After Scrutiny Notice U/s 143(2) Void Ab Initio: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench, has held that an intimation issued...
Direct Tax

S. 151 Approval Failed to Consider Assessee’s Reply: Calcutta High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice 

The Calcutta High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2017-18 after...