S. 263 Is Not A Second Opinion — It’s For Real Errors: ITAT

HomeDirect TaxS. 263 Is Not A Second Opinion — It’s For Real Errors:...

S. 263 Is Not A Second Opinion — It’s For Real Errors: ITAT

Direct Tax Top Stories

Published on

18/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that revision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained where the Assessing Officer has already made enquiries, examined the material on record, and taken a plausible view—because Section 263 is not a review or “second opinion” jurisdiction. The bench of Mahavir…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Second Opinion

S. 263 Is Not A Second Opinion — It’s For Real Errors: ITAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 10, 2026

West Asia Conflict Disrupts Indian Exports: Hyundai Car Consignment, Thousands of Containers Likely to Return to Chennai Port

Supreme Court Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Minority Share Buyout

Assessment Framed U/s 143(3) Instead of Mandatory S. 153C for Non-Searched Person Is Invalid: ITAT

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 10, 2026

West Asia Conflict Disrupts Indian Exports: Hyundai Car Consignment, Thousands of Containers Likely to Return to Chennai Port

Supreme Court Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Minority Share Buyout

About us

Company

Categories