HomeDirect TaxPenalty Can’t Be Imposed on Debatable Issue Pending Before High Court: ITAT...

Penalty Can’t Be Imposed on Debatable Issue Pending Before High Court: ITAT Quashes Rs. 20.56 Lakh Penalty on SIDBI

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed penalty proceedings initiated against Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench of Sandeep Singh Karhail (Judicial Member) and Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member) has held that once a substantial question of law on…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere Balance Sheet Discrepancies Insufficient To Deny CENVAT Credit Without Evidence of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Single Form 141 to Replace Form 26QB: Change In Property TDS Compliance Framework

The Government has introduced a new unified reporting mechanism—Form 141—to replace the existing Form...

Forfeiture of Hotel Booking Advances Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, has held...

Unjust Enrichment Applies Even If Tax Not Payable: CESTAT Rejects Service Tax Refund

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has dismissed the...

More like this

Mere Balance Sheet Discrepancies Insufficient To Deny CENVAT Credit Without Evidence of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Single Form 141 to Replace Form 26QB: Change In Property TDS Compliance Framework

The Government has introduced a new unified reporting mechanism—Form 141—to replace the existing Form...

Forfeiture of Hotel Booking Advances Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, has held...