Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect Tax“Payment to Self” Can’t Be Taxed as FTS: ITAT Deletes Addition on...

“Payment to Self” Can’t Be Taxed as FTS: ITAT Deletes Addition on Reimbursement Paid by Indian PE to Australian Head Office

Direct Tax

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
ITAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that reimbursement of actual staff costs by an Indian Project Office (PO) to its Australian Head Office (HO) cannot be taxed as Fees for Technical Services (FTS), observing that a transaction with oneself cannot give rise to taxable income.  The bench of Vikas…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Computer Data Without S. 36B Certificate, Untested Statements Can’t Prove Clandestine Clearance: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Pre-June 2007 Composite Residential Works Contracts: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Bagasse Is Agricultural Waste, Rule 6 CENVAT Demand Unsustainable: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Revenue Sharing Under Development Agreement Is Consideration for Stamp Duty: Bombay HC Upholds Rs. 43.84 Lakh Deficit Demand

The Bombay High Court has held that an agreed share in the gross sale...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Computer Data Without S. 36B Certificate, Untested Statements Can’t Prove Clandestine Clearance: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Pre-June 2007 Composite Residential Works Contracts: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Bagasse Is Agricultural Waste, Rule 6 CENVAT Demand Unsustainable: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...