“Payment to Self” Can’t Be Taxed as FTS: ITAT Deletes Addition on Reimbursement Paid by Indian PE to Australian Head Office

HomeDirect Tax“Payment to Self” Can’t Be Taxed as FTS: ITAT Deletes Addition on...

“Payment to Self” Can’t Be Taxed as FTS: ITAT Deletes Addition on Reimbursement Paid by Indian PE to Australian Head Office

Direct Tax

Published on

12/05/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that reimbursement of actual staff costs by an Indian Project Office (PO) to its Australian Head Office (HO) cannot be taxed as Fees for Technical Services (FTS), observing that a transaction with oneself cannot give rise to taxable income. The bench of Vikas…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Payment to Self

“Payment to Self” Can’t Be Taxed as FTS: ITAT Deletes Addition on Reimbursement Paid by Indian PE to Australian Head Office

Membership Required

Latest articles

Defence Evidence Must Receive Equal Judicial Consideration: Supreme Court Acquits Husband in 26-Year-Old Dowry Death Case

Mere Recovery of Illegal Arms from House Not Enough; Prosecution Must Prove Conscious Possession Under Arms Act: Supreme Court

S. 22 of Hindu Succession Act Applies to Agricultural Land: Supreme Court Upholds Co-Heirs’ Preferential Right

Apportionment of Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation: Supreme Court Orders Full Release of Award to Major Children

More like this

Defence Evidence Must Receive Equal Judicial Consideration: Supreme Court Acquits Husband in 26-Year-Old Dowry Death Case

Mere Recovery of Illegal Arms from House Not Enough; Prosecution Must Prove Conscious Possession Under Arms Act: Supreme Court

S. 22 of Hindu Succession Act Applies to Agricultural Land: Supreme Court Upholds Co-Heirs’ Preferential Right

About us

Company

Categories