HomeDirect TaxSupreme Court Disposed Of 573 Direct Tax Cases Where Tax Effect Is...

Supreme Court Disposed Of 573 Direct Tax Cases Where Tax Effect Is Less Than Rs. 5 Crore

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court today disposed off 573 direct tax cases where the tax effect is less than ₹5 crore, in view of the revised monetary limit of filing of appeals.

This significant milestone aligns with the government’s efforts to reduce tax litigation and promote Ease of Doing Business. 

The Union Budget 2024-25 provided for an enhanced monetary limit for filing appeals related to Direct Taxes, Excise and Service Tax in the Tax Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Court and the limits were increased to ₹60 lakh, ₹2 crore and ₹5 crore respectively.

In pursuant to the Budget 2024-25 announcement, the CBDT and CBIC had issued necessary orders to enhance the monetary limit for filing appeals in their respective domains. As a result, it is expected that the cases pending before various appellate fora will come down and reduce tax litigation. 

Direct Tax

As per the announcements in the Union Budget 2024-25, the monetary thresholds for filing tax dispute appeals by the department were enhanced as follows: 

  • For Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): Increased from ₹50 lakh to ₹60 lakh.
  • For High Courts: Increased from ₹1 crore to ₹2 crore.
  • For Supreme Court: Increased from ₹2 crore to ₹5 crore.

As a result of these revised limits, it is estimated that around 4,300 cases will be withdrawn from various judicial forums over the course of time:

  • ITAT: 700 cases
  • High Courts: 2,800 cases
  • Supreme Court: 800 cases

Indirect Taxes

Similarly, the limit for filing appeals for the specified legacy Central Excise & Service Tax cases was increased: 

  • For CESTAT (Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal), the limit was increased to ₹60 lakh from ₹50 lakh
  • For the High Court, the limit was increased to ₹2 crore from ₹1 crore.
  • For the Supreme Court, the limit was increased to ₹5 crore from ₹2 crore.  

As a result of these revised limits, it is estimated that around 1,050 cases pertaining to specified legacy Central Excise & Service Tax cases are estimated to be withdrawn from various judicial forums:

  • Supreme Court: 250 appeals 
  • High Courts: 550 appeals 
  • CESTAT: 250 appeals 

Along with Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, a measure introduced recently to reduce pending litigation, these measures on the Direct tax and Indirect tax front are expected to significantly reduce the burden of tax litigation and expedite the resolution of tax disputes. 

Read More: BREAKING | 291 CASES FILED BY INCOME TAX DEPT. WHERE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN 5 CRORES LISTED BEFORE SUPREME COURT TODAY

In addition, steps have been taken to deploy more officers dedicated to hearing and deciding income tax appeals, particularly those involving significant tax amounts. These initiatives reflect the government’s commitment to improve the ‘Ease of Living’ and ‘Ease of Doing Business’ across the country by reducing pending litigation.

Conclusion

The measures are expected to significantly reduce the burden of tax litigation and expedite the resolution of tax disputes in alignment with Government’s efforts to promote ‘Ease of Living’ and ‘Ease of Doing Business’.

Read Press Release

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

GSTN Enables Opt-Out Facility for Taxpayers Registered Under Rule 14A

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has announced that taxpayers registered under Rule...

Tribunal Order Can’t Be Treated as ‘Additional Evidence’; 18% IGST Upheld on Medical Monitors: CESTAT 

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

Merits Must Prevail Over Technical Delay in GST Late Fee Dispute: Rajasthan HC Allows Appeal Beyond Limitation

The Rajasthan High Court has condoned delay in filing a statutory appeal under the...

CBIC’s Rs. 2 Crore Litigation Threshold Covers Ongoing Appeals, Not Just Fresh Filings: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the circular issued by Central Board of Indirect...

More like this

GSTN Enables Opt-Out Facility for Taxpayers Registered Under Rule 14A

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has announced that taxpayers registered under Rule...

Tribunal Order Can’t Be Treated as ‘Additional Evidence’; 18% IGST Upheld on Medical Monitors: CESTAT 

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

Merits Must Prevail Over Technical Delay in GST Late Fee Dispute: Rajasthan HC Allows Appeal Beyond Limitation

The Rajasthan High Court has condoned delay in filing a statutory appeal under the...