Supreme Court Sends JAO vs Faceless Reassessment Dispute Back to High Courts; Validity of Retrospective Law Still Open

HomeDirect TaxSupreme Court Sends JAO vs Faceless Reassessment Dispute Back to High Courts;...

Supreme Court Sends JAO vs Faceless Reassessment Dispute Back to High Courts; Validity of Retrospective Law Still Open

Direct Tax

Published on

30/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has set aside multiple High Court judgments that had quashed reassessment notices issued under Sections 148 and 148A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The Court has remitted the matters back to the respective High Courts for fresh consideration in light of recent legislative amendments. The…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Supreme Court Sends JAO vs Faceless Reassessment Dispute Back to High Courts; Validity of Retrospective Law Still Open

Membership Required

Latest articles

ICAI Releases CA Final November 2026 Eligibility Criteria

Appeals under the Income-tax Act, 2025: What’s New and What Remains Unchanged?

Bombay High Court Adds 49 Advocates to Panel of Arbitrators and Conciliators

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 04 July, 2026

More like this

ICAI Releases CA Final November 2026 Eligibility Criteria

Appeals under the Income-tax Act, 2025: What’s New and What Remains Unchanged?

Bombay High Court Adds 49 Advocates to Panel of Arbitrators and Conciliators

About us

Company

Categories